S. 32 : Depreciation-Car purchased in the name of director–Reflected in the balance sheet of the Company–Depreciation is allowable.
Shree Laxmi Estate (P. ) Ltd. v. ITO (2019) 178 ITD 98 /( 2020) 204 TTJ 351 (Mum.)(Trib. )S. 32 : Depreciation-Car purchased in the name of director–Reflected in the balance sheet of the Company–Depreciation is allowable.
Shree Laxmi Estate (P. ) Ltd. v. ITO (2019) 178 ITD 98 /( 2020) 204 TTJ 351 (Mum.)(Trib. )S. 32 : Depreciation-Income from house property–Properties continued to form block of assets–Depreciation is not allowable. [S. 2(11)]
Emco Dyestuff (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT (2019) 178 ITD 111 / 184 DTR 345(Mum.)(Trib.)S. 28(i) : Business loss-loss on account of shifting in securities–Fall in the value of investments allowable as a deduction irrespective of change in classification of investments to comply with RBI guidelines. [S. 37(1)]
City Union Bank Ltd. v. ACIT (2019) 74 ITR 644 (Chennai)(Trib.)S. 28(i) : Business loss-Purchase and sale of securities – loss arising from sale of securities–Allowable as business loss.
Dy. CIT v. Sahara Care Ltd. (2019) 74 ITR 117 (Delhi)(Trib.)S. 28(i) : Business loss-Advance to subsidiary-Subsidiary has gone to liquidation-Loss is allowable as business loss. [S. 2(13), 37(1)]
Dy. CIT v. Pioneer Investcorp Ltd. (2019) 72 ITR 376 (Mum.)(Trib.)S. 14A : Disallowance of expenditure-Exempt income-Not recording of satisfaction-No disallowance can be made. [R. 8D (2)(ii)]
Dy. CIT v. Impulse International P. Ltd. (2019) 71 ITR 28 (SN) (Delhi)(Trib. )S. 14A : Disallowance of expenditure-Exempt income-No exempt income earned during the year-No disallowance can be made. [R. 8D]
Dy. CIT v. Jammu Metalic Oxides Pvt. Ltd. (2019) 72 ITR 449 (Jaipur)(Trib. )S. 14A : Disallowance of expenditure-Exempt income-No disallowance can be made in absence of dividend income. [S.57(iii), R. 8D]
Dy. CIT v. Kotu Sarat Kumar (2019) 71 ITR 147 (Vishakha) (Trib. )S. 14A : Disallowance of expenditure-Exempt income–For the calculation of average investments only those investments from which exempt income is derived. Assessee did not derive any exempt income matter remitted back to AO. [R. 8D]
Cox & Kings Ltd. v. Addl. CIT (2019) 55 CCH 75/ 69 ITR 45 (SN) (Mum.) (Trib.)S. 14A : Disallowance of expenditure-Exempt income – Without recording satisfaction – No disallowances can be made. [R. 8D ]
Dy. CIT v. Sahara Care Ltd. (2019) 74 ITR 117 (Delhi)(Trib. )