S. 45 : Capital gains–Business income-Sale of shares–Average holding period of 628 days-Assessable as capital gains. [S. 28(i)]
CIT v. Hiren M. Shah. (2019) 413 ITR 143/ 264 Taxman 320 (Bom.)(HC)S. 45 : Capital gains–Business income-Sale of shares–Average holding period of 628 days-Assessable as capital gains. [S. 28(i)]
CIT v. Hiren M. Shah. (2019) 413 ITR 143/ 264 Taxman 320 (Bom.)(HC)S. 43B : Certain deductions on actual payment -Excise duty — Unutilised Modvat Credit as at end of year on inputs purchased, constitutes actual payment and deductible.
Glaxo Smithkline Consumer Healthcare Ltd. v. ACIT (2019) 413 ITR 104 / 307 CTR 601/ 174 DTR 322 (P&H) (HC)S. 4 : Charge of income-tax –Capital or revenue – Capital subsidy In terms of shareholders’ agreement from foreign company for investment in share capital of joint venture company — Capital receipt not liable to tax as revenue receipt. [S. 28(i)]
Sundaram Finance Ltd. v. ACIT (2019) 413 ITR 298 (Mad)(HC)S. 260A : Appeal-High Court – Issue not raised and adjudicated by lower authorities – Cannot be permitted to be raised for first time in appeal to High Court .[ S.195A, 201(1) 201(1A) ]
TVS Motor Co. Ltd. v. ITO (2018) 258 Taxman 77/170 DTR 15 / 304 CTR 853 / ( 2019) 413 ITR 171 (Mad.)(HC)/Editorial :SLP dismissed as withdrawn , TVS Motor Company Ltd v. ITO (IT) ( 2024) 298 Taxman 550 ( SC)S. 201 : Deduction at source-Failure to deduct or pay-Date of tendering of cheque for payment of Government dues could be deemed to be date of payment of tax-Delay in remittance of said amount to Government account by Bank, no interest can be levied. [S. 201(IA)]
Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. v. DCIT (2019) 176 ITD 124 / 197 TTJ 137 (Mum.)(Trib.)S. 115JB : Book profit–Change in deprecation rate–Reduction due to change in depreciation rate is different from diminution in value of assets and same is not hit by clause (i) of Explanation 1 to section 115JB-Self serving evaluation of useful life of depreciable assets leading to higher rate of depreciation and consequently resulting reduced tax burden for assessee was not bonafide, same would be a colourable device to evade tax- Matter remanded to Assessing Officer for verification. [S. 32]
DCIT v. Railtel Corpn. of India Ltd. (2018) 176 ITD 169 (Delhi) (Trib.)S. 69 : Unexplained investments-Addition cannot be made in year under consideration in respect of investment in immovable property made in earlier year.
Preeti Singh.( Km.) v. ITO (2019) 176 ITD 137 / 179 DTR 325 (Delhi)(Trib.)S. 68 : Cash credits-Share premium-Nature and source of share premium received is explained-Addition cannot be made as cash credits.
Jayneer infrapower & Multiventures (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT (2019) 176 ITD 15/200 TTJ 179 (Mum.)(Trib.)S. 68 : Cash credits–Share application-High premium–Addition as unexplained cash credit is held to be justified.
Ayaana Comtrade (P.) Ltd. v. ITO (2019) 176 ITD 6 (Ahd.) (Trib.)S. 56 : Income from other sources–Gift-Assesse was transferor and not recipient and shares in question were those of listed companies- provisions of section 56(2)(viia) would not apply. [S. 56(2)(viia)]
Jayneer infrapower & Multiventures (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT (2019) 176 ITD 15 / 200 TTJ 179(Mum.)(Trib.)