This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws
S. 271C : Penalty-Failure to deduct at source-It is necessary to establish that there was contumacious conduct on the part of the assessee- Penalty levied was deleted. [S. 273B]
Jaipur National University v. Jt. CIT (2019) 175 DTR 337 (Japur.) (Trib.)
S. 147 : Reassessment–After the expiry of four years–The assessment framed by AO who had not issued notice u/s. 148 of the Act is void-ab-initio –Notice was issued by the AO who had no jurisdiction- Reassessment is held to be bad in law . [S. 2(7A), 148]
Gaurav Joshi v. ITO(2019) 174 DTR 353 / 197 TTJ 946 (Asr.) (Trib.)
S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years- Re-opening Reopening merely on the basis of information received from investigation wing without application of mind is not valid. [S. 148]
Holy Faith International Pvt. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2019) 69 ITR 687 (Asr.)(Trib.)
S. 143(3) : Assessment–Order giving effect to revision order– Assessing Officer is bound to follow the directions provided in the order u/s. 263 by the CIT. [S. 263]
Fortune Vincom Pvt. Ltd. v. ITO (2019) 69 ITR 48 (SN) (Kol.)(Trib.)
S. 133A : Power of survey – Statement recorded u/s. 133A of the Act does not hold any evidentiary value without any corroborative evidence-Deletion of addition is held to be justified.
Habib Tannery P. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2019) 69 ITR 28 (SN.) (Luck.)(Trib.)
S. 68 : Cash credits – Gain from off market trading in commodities – Statement of the broker that his company had not made any off market transactions with other clients–AO based on the statement assumed that transactions were not genuine–All details filed and even broker confirmed transactions–AO further denied set off against loss from F & O market–Addition deleted. [S. 115BBE]
ITO v. Prism Share Trading (P) Ltd. (2019) 174 DTR 257 / 197 TTJ 733 (Mum.)(Trib.)
S. 56 : Income from other sources-AO can scrutinize the valuation report and determine a fresh valuation either by himself or by calling from independent valuer to conform the assessee but the basis has to be DCF method.
Innoviti Payments Solutions P. Ltd. v. ITO (2019) 69 ITR 33 (SN.) (Bang.)(Trib.)
S. 54 : Capital gains-Profit on sale of property used for residence – Exemption cannot be denied on the ground that investment in new flat is out of loan funds if other conditions are fulfilled. [S. 45]
Hansa Shah v. ITO (2019) 69 ITR 334 (Mum.)(Trib.)
S. 41(1) : Profits chargeable to tax-Remission or cessation of trading liability–Provision can be invoked only if deduction of the very same sum is allowed in earlier years.
Grand Wood Works and Saw Mills v. ITO (2019) 69 ITR 3 (SN) (Mum.)(Trib.)
S. 37(1) : Business expenditure–Sales promotion expenses-Gifts to various customers-No expenditure shall be allowed as deduction in case assessee is unable to establish the nexus between incurrence of expenditure with the business activities.
Grand Wood Works and Saw Mills v. ITO (2019) 69 ITR 3 (SN.) (Mum.)(Trib.)