This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws
S. 221 : Penalty—Failure to pay self-assessment tax—amendment prescribing mandatory charge of interest—Amendment does not envisage penalty for non-payment of self-assessment tax. [S.140A(3), 221(1)]
Balraj Prakashchand Bansal v. Dy. CIT (2018) 64 ITR 62 (SN) (Mum.)(Trib.)
S. 153C : Assessment-Income of any other person-Search and Seizure—Issue of notice is mandatory-The amendment in S.153C by the Finance Act, 2017, with effect from April 1, 2017 to the effect that the block period for the person in respect of whom the search was conducted as well as the “other person” would be the same six assessment years immediately preceding the year of search was prospective in nature-Order is held to be bad in law. [S.132, 153B(1)(b)]
BNB Investment and Properties Ltd. v. DY.CIT (2018) 68 ITR 567 (Delhi) (Trib.) Ranjan Gupta v. DY.CIT (2018) 68 ITR 567 (Delhi)(Trib.)
S. 153C : Assessment-Income of any other person-Search and seizure—Satisfaction note is not available-Assessment is held to be bad in law. [S. 153A]
Avalanche Reality P. Ltd. v. ACIT (2018) 68 ITR 79 (SN) (Indore)(Trib.)
S. 147 : Reassessment-Deposit in bank–Merely on the basis of deposit made in bank, reassessment is not valid when there is contradiction between statement recorded and information of recording reasons. [S. 148]
Inder Jeet v. ITO (2018) 68 ITR 71 (SN) (Delhi)(Trib.) Ashok Kumar v. ITO (2018) 68 ITR 71 (SN) (Delhi)(Trib.)
S. 143(3) : Assessment–Assessment of amalgamating company-Notices were issued prior to the amalgamation with another company–Assessment proceedings cannot be held to be invalid. [S.142(1), 143(2)]
Cyient Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2018) 194 TTJ 69 / 167 DTR 281(Hyd.)(Trib.)
S. 92C : Transfer pricing–Arm’s Length price-CUP method-TNMM- International transactions combined by assessee for showing them at ALP cannot be aggregated where assessee fails to show any inextricable link between these transactions as one not surviving without the other and there is no package deal and the international transaction in question is separately valued and there is nothing to show an understanding that the pricing was dependent upon the assessee accepting all of them together- Matter remanded.
Atotech India Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT (2018) 167 DTR 17 / 194 TTJ 1 (Delhi)(Trib.)
S. 92C : Transfer pricing–Arm’s length price–CUP method- Interest free loan to subsidiary–Shares were allotted– Adjustment is held to be not justified.
Bartronics India Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2018) 65 ITR 540 (Hyd)(Trib.)
S. 92C : Transfer pricing–Inter group services-Payments in accordance with the written agreements-Adjustment is held to be not justified. [S. 92CA]
Avery Dennison (India) Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT (2018) 68 ITR 486 (Delhi)(Trib.)
S. 80P : Co-Operative society—Investments in other co-operative societies – AO is directed to grant exemption if institutions where the assessee has made investments is found to be co-operative society. [S. 80P(2)(d)]
Banas Bank Staff Credit Co-Op. Society Ltd. v. ACIT (2018) 64 ITR 68 (Ahd.)(Trib.)
S. 68 : Cash credits—Deposit in bank account-Not maintaining books of account–Presumptive taxation–Return was accepted-Addition as cash credit is held to be not valid. [S. 44AF]
Babbal Bhatia (Smt.) v. ITO (2018) 65 ITR 532 (Delhi) (Trib.)