S. 151 : Reassessment – Sanction for issue of notice -Reassessment proceedings couldn’t be quashed just because AO had obtained prior approval from higher authority [ S. 147, 148 ]

S. 151 : Reassessment – Sanction for issue of notice –Mechanical approval was held to be bad in law [ S. 147, 148 ]

S. 151: Reassessment – After the expiry of four years – Sanction of the Chief Commissioner was a pre-condition. [ S.147,148, 149 ]

S. 151 : Reassessment – Sanction for issue of notice – After expiry of four years – Notice and proceedings was vitiated for want of specific sanction .[ S. 147, 148 ]

S. 147 : Reassessment –Clerical mistake- The object and purpose behind S. 292B is to ensure that technical pleas on the ground of mistake, defect or omission should not invalidate the assessment proceedings, when no confusion or prejudice is caused due to non-observance of technical formalities [ S. 148, 292B ]

S. 147: Reassessment- Reassessment on the basis of information received from investigation wing for alleged accommodation entries and denial by parties the reopening was held to be bad in law [ S. 148 ]

S.147: Reassessment- Failure to disclose beneficial owner of deposits in foreign Bank accounts -Reassessment was held to be justified [ S.69 , 148 ]

S.147: Reassessment — Issue was not considered in the original assessment proceedings hence reassessment was held to be valid. As regard the allowability of depreciation on stock exchange membership the matter was remanded .[ S. 32, 148 ]

S. 147: Reassessment — Reopening on same issues as considered in rectification proceedings earlier was held to be not valid [ S. 148 ]

S. 147: Reassessment — Non-speaking order disposing of Assessee’s objection against reassessment — Reassessment was held to be invalid [ S.68, 148 ]