S. 44C : Non-residents-Head office expenditure-Entire expenditure was for purposes of head office-No restrictions in terms could be imposed-Order of Tribunal is affirmed. [S. 260A]
CIT v. Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corpn. Ltd. (2019) 267 Taxman 502 / 111 taxmann.com 284 (Bom.)(HC) Editorial : SLP of revenue is dismissed as the tax effect involved of less than 2 crores, CIT v. Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corpn. Ltd. (2019) 267 Taxman 501 (SC)