This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S. 69C : Unexplained expenditure-Un explained investment-Bogus purchases-Accommodation entries-Sales accepted-Addition is restricted to gross profit of 6.19%. [S.28(i), 69, 143]

Mahir Diamonds v. ITO (2024) 208 ITD 626/114 ITR 80(SN) (Mum) (Trib.)

S. 69C : Unexplained expenditure-Bogus purchases-filed details of purchases made and corresponding quantity of sales made-Entire purchases could not have been added to income-Only profit element can be taxed.

Heena Gems v. ACIT (2024) 208 ITD 481/114 ITR 30(SN) (Mum) (Trib.)

S. 69C : Unexplained expenditure-Diary-Cash expenses-Absence of specific details in the affidavit-Addition is affirmed. [S. 132]

Kailash Gahlot. v. DCIT (2024) 208 ITD 25 /113 ITR 62 (SN) (Delhi) (Trib.)

S. 69A : Unexplained money-Cash deposit-Demonetization period-Source explained-Addition is deleted.[S.115BBE]

Dipak Balubhai Patel (HUF) v. ITO 2024] 208 ITD 386/115 ITR 624 (Ahd) (Trib.)

S. 69 :Unexplained investments-Cash deposit of 3 lakh-Returned income of assessee is more than Rs. 50 lakhs, cash deposit of around 3 lakhs could not be treated as unexplained investment.

Ravi Jakhar v. ACIT (2024) 208 ITD 633 (Mum) (Trib.)

S. 69 :Unexplained investments-Bogus purchases-Accommodation entries-Disallowance is restricted at rate of 6 per cent of bogus purchases-Sale of shares-Explained the source of purchase-Order of CIT(A deleting the addition is affirmed-Reassessment is affirmed.[S. 147, 148]

DCIT v. Center Point Gems (P.) Ltd. (2024) 208 ITD 213 (Surat) (Trib.)

S. 68 : Cash credits-Penny stock-Long term capital gains-Accommodation entries-DMAT-Sale of shares of PS Infrastructure and Services Limited-Addition is deleted-Exemption is allowed.[S. 10(38), 45]

Vikram N. Chandan. v. ITO (2024) 208 ITD 723 (Mum) (Trib.)

S. 68 : Cash credits-Bogus donations-Cash deposited in banks-Addition is justified. [S. 35AC, 35AC(ii)]

Vaibhav Pankaj Shah v. ACIT (2024) 208 ITD 718 /231 TTJ 869 / 241 DTR 25(Mum) (Trib.)

S. 68 : Cash credits-Long term capital gains-Accommodation entries-Penny stock-Purchase of shares of LDPL and MARL in off-market transactions-Inordinate delay in dematerialization of those shares-Transaction is not genuine-Addition is justified. [S.10(38). 45]

Shailesh K. Patel HUF. v. ITO (2024) 208 ITD 539/ 231 TTJ 929/243 DTR 201 (Ahd) (Trib.)

S. 68 : Cash credits-long-term capital gain-Sale of shares-Penny stock-Accommodation entries-Information from investigation Wing-Purchase in physical form-Decartelized-Purchase was made through Banking channels-Deletion of addition by CIT(A) is affirmed. [S. 10(38), 45]

ITO v. Prakashmal Malraj Jain. (2024) 208 ITD 403 (Mum) (Trib.)