This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws
S. 144C: Reference to dispute resolution panel-Limitation-Company amalgamated with assessee and ceasing to exist-Fact of amalgamation intimated to department-Order of Transfer Pricing Officer and draft assessment order issued in name of non-existing company-Invalid-Directions of Dispute Resolution Panel and final assessment passed in name of assessee-Not valid-Assessee ceasing to be eligible assessee and reduced time-limit for assessment-Assessment is barred by limitation .[ S.92CA (3)
Emerson Process Management (India) P. Ltd. v. Asst. CIT (2023)106 ITR 14 (SN)/ 154 taxmann.com 291 (Mum)(Trib )
S. 144C: Reference to dispute resolution panel-Transfer pricing-Reference to Transfer Pricing Officer-Arm’s Length price-Avoidance of tax-Remand order-Order passed by Assessing Officer giving effect to order of Dispute Resolution Panel without understanding Tribunal’s order-Matter remanded to Assessing Officer for adjudication afresh. [S. 92CA]
CET Power Solutions India P. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2023)106 ITR 68 (SN)/ 153 taxmann.com 553 (Chennai ) (Trib)
S. 144C : Reference to dispute resolution panel-International Transactions-Arm’s Length Price-Limitation-Period of sixty days to be counted from day prior to date on which period of limitation for assessment expires-Order barred by limitation-Order non est-Ceased to be eligible assessee-Draft assessment order, directions of Dispute Resolution Panel and final asessment order void ab initio-Tribunal has the power to admit additional ground on limitation . [ S.92CA(3) 153 , 254(1) ]
Teleperformance Global Services P. Ltd. v. Add. CIT (2023) 106 ITR 81 (Mum) (Trib)
S. 143(3) : Assessment-Amalgamation of companies-Income taxed merely on basis of details in Form 26AS of erstwhile company-Assessing Officer is directed to adjudicate afresh after examination of details furnished by assessee and details in Form 26AS-Deduction only on actual payment-Gratuity-Allowability of gratuity restored to Assessing Officer for de novo adjudication.[S. 43B]
Maccaferri Environmental Solutions P. Ltd. v .Asst. CIT (2023)106 ITR 62 (SN)(Mum) (Trib)
S. 143(3) : Assessment-Jurisdiction of Authorities-Instruction of Board that non-corporate assessees in Metro cities declaring income up to Rs. 20 Lakhs to be assessed by Income-Tax Officer-Returned income of assessee Less Than Rs. 20 Lakhs-Assessment Completed By Deputy Commissioner without jurisdiction-Instruction No. 1 of 2011, Dated 31-1-2011.
Ketan Tokershi Shah v. Dy. CIT (2023)106 ITR 4 (SN)(Mum) (Trib)
S. 143(2): Assessment-Notice-Mandatory-Failure to issue notice-Assessment is null and void. [S. 143(3), 147, 148]
Nikesh A. Gada (HUF) v. ITO (2023)106 ITR 590 (Mum) (Trib)
S. 139 : Return of income-Revised return-Once revised return is filed, Assessing Officer is not entitled to advert to original return of income-Loss-Loss to be allowed-Assessing Officer could not disturb apparent consideration by substituting agreed consideration by fair market value. [S. 2(11)32(i)(ii),43(6), 50, 72(1) 71(2), 74(1) 80, 139(3), 139(5), 143(3)]
Dy. CIT v. Bilcare Ltd. (2023) 106 ITR 411/ 224 TTJ 655 / 151 taxmann.com 456 (Pune) (Trib)
S. 132 : Search and Seizure-Statement in the course of search-Retraction-Retraction not to be rejected as afterthought merely because filed after search, retraction is held to be valid-Warrant of authorisation-Not necessary to issue warrant of authorisation in each and every case-Search proceedings continuing for number of days and assessee required to be present throughout-Does not mean that the assessee has kept in illegal detention. [S. 132(4)]
Dy. CIT v. T. S. Kumarasamy (2023)106 ITR 18 (SN) (Chennai) (Trib)
S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Avoidance of tax-International transaction-Sale of goods to associated enterprises-Comparative-Matter remanded to the Assessing Officer .
Weatherford Drilling And Production Services (India) P. Ltd. v Asst. CIT (2023)106 ITR 46 (SN) / 154 taxmann.com 248 (Ahd) (Trib)
S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Avoidance of tax-International transaction-Interest on delayed receivables-To Be Benchmarked Applying State Bank Of India Short-Term Deposit Interest Rate For Year-No Material To Show Grace Period Allowed By Assessee To Associated Enterprise-Assessing Officer Granting 30 Days-Proper. [S. 92B, 92F(v)]
HM Clause India P. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2023)106 ITR 91 (SN.)/ 153 taxmann.com 209 (Hyd.)(Trib.)