This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws
Income Declaration Scheme 2016 (IDS) -Finance Act , 2016 ( 2016) 381 ITR 134 (St) (S. 178 to 196) , ( 2016) 384 ITR 165 (St)- ( Refer AIFTPJ. July 2016 )
S.195: Power to remove difficulties- Not depositing the first instalment with in time – Board refusing to condonation of delay – Concession and excess indulgence would demotivating effect on honest taxpayers making regular and prompt tax deposit -Dismissal of application is held to be justified [ S.184, ITA, S.119 Art.14 ]
Sadhana R.Jain v CBDT ( 2019) 174 DTR 385/ 307 CTR 207 / 103 taxmann.com 70 (Bom) (HC) Editorial order of High Court set aside , Sadhana R. Jain v. CBDT (2022) 287 Taxman 562 (SC)
S.37(1): Business expenditure — Provision for damaged goods -Held to be allowable .
Rasna P. Ltd. v. DCIT (2018) 63 ITR 28 (SN)(Ahd) (Trib)
S.28(i):Business Loss — Soft drinks — Product having limited shelf Life —Non useable or non saleable which was destroyed – Allowable as business loss .
Rasna P. Ltd. v. DCIT (2018)63 ITR 28 (SN)(Ahd) (Trib)
S.28(i): Business loss — Litigation and bona fide dispute about goods at Bangladesh border – Foreseeable Loss — Held to be allowable . [ S.37(1), 145 ]
Rasna P. Ltd. v. DCIT (2018) 63 ITR 28 (SN)(Ahd) (Trib)
S. 54F : Capital gains – Investment in a residential house -Investment in new asset is greater than capital gains -Partly out of sale proceeds and partly with bank Loan —Exemption is available [ S.45 ]
Kayvanbhai Surendrabhai Huttheesingh v. ITO (2018) 63 ITR 17 (SN) (SMC)(Ahd) (Trib)
S. 147 : Reassessment -No tangible material- Reassessment is held to be not valid [ S.148 ]
DCIT v. Sandvik Information Technology AB (2018) 63 ITR 19 (SN)(Pune) (Trib)
S.253: Appellate Tribunal – Tax Effect below prescribed limit -Appeal is not maintainable .
DCIT v. Talwar Mobiles P. Ltd. (2018) 63 ITR 18(SN) (Hyd) (Trib)
S. 263 : Commissioner – Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue – Cash credits -Share application money -Details were filed in the original assessment proceedings -AO is not to be expected to discuss each and every item of verification in assessment order- Revision is held to be not justified .[ S.143(3)]
RBS Credit And Financial Development P. Ltd. v. CIT (2018) 63 ITR 20 (SN) (Kol)( Trib)
S. 264 : Commissioner-Revision of other orders–Filed after expiry period of limitation- justified in dismissing the petition. [S. 143(3), 147]
Jindal Metal Co. v. PCIT (2019) 260 Taxman 220/ 176 DTR 299/ 308 CTR 180 (Delhi)(HC)
S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Interest income – Accrual- No failure to disclose material facts–Reassessment is bad in law. [ S. 5, 148]
PCIT v. State Bank of Saurashtra (2019) 260 Taxman 194 (Bom.)(HC)