This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws
S. 251 : Appeal – Commissioner (Appeals) –Powers- Doctrine of merger- Powers –After filing an appeal the assessee filed revision application- Despite the revisional order being passed the Commissioner (Appeals) decided the same issue- Once revision petition was filed and decided, it was not open to Commissioner (Appeals) to decide appeal on same issue. [S. 264 ]
Nitin Babubhai Rohit v. Ashok Bhavanbhai Patel (2018) 258 Taxman 252/ 172 DTR 388/ 305 CTR 979 (Guj.)(HC)
S. 245D : Settlement Commission –Revenue cannot compel the Settlement Commission to reopen the earlier years by passing rectification order- Petition is dismissed. [S. 154,245C]
CIT v. Income-tax Settlement Commission (2018) 258 Taxman 36 (Guj.)(HC)
S. 237 : Refunds –Annulment of assessment -Only tax paid by assessee in excess of what was declared by it on its own in return of income would be entitled to be refunded [ S.4(1), 140A(3), 158BD, 240(b), 244]
Dr. Thirupathy Reddy (HUF) v. ACIT (2018) 258 Taxman 177/(2019) 410 ITR 186 (Mad.)(HC)
S. 234B : Interest – Advance tax – Sale proceeds were deposited in a ‘No Lien’ account with bank as per direction of BIFR – Assessee could not remit tax within time as amount received from sale proceeds were lying with bank –Rejection application for waiver of interest I held to be not justified- Directed the Commissioner to pass the order on merits. [ S.220(2)]
Travancore Sugars & Chemicals Ltd. v. Addl. CIT (2018) 258 Taxman 273 (Ker.)(HC)
S. 226 : Collection and recovery -Stay- Pendency of Appeal before – Commissioner (Appeals) –CIT(A) granted stay on condition of 50% of tax in dispute- Single judge reduced to 20% of tax in dispute –On appeal considering the assessee being a co-operative bank , stay is granted by paying 1 % 0f tax in dispute. [ S.68, 249]
Aruvikkara Farmers Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd. v. ITO (2018) 258 Taxman 18 (Ker.)(HC)
S. 226 : Collection and recovery – Modes of recovery –Co-operative societies -Cash credits- Direction to deposit 50% of tax in dispute is reduced to 20% and directed the CIT(A) to expedite the hearing. [S.68, 80P]
Mundela Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd. v. ITO (2018) 258 Taxman 233 (Ker.)(HC)
S. 222 : Collection and recovery –Auction of property- Direction of CBDT to hold fresh auction after determining the a reserve price by taking in to account fresh valuation report of District valuer is held to be justified. [ S.269UD ]
Sankalp Recreation (P.) Ltd. v. Union of India (2018) 258 Taxman 341 / (2019) 411 ITR 671 (Bom.)(HC) Editorial: Affirmed , Sankalp Recreation Pvt.Ltd v. UOI (2019) 418 ITR 673/ 267 Taxman 13 (SC)
S. 220 : Collection and recovery – Assessee deemed in default – When an appeal is pending there is no automatic stay – Commissioner (Appeals) is directed to dispose of appeal expeditiously- Matter remanded. [S. 154, 246]
MPhasis Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2018) 258 Taxman 120 (Karn.)(HC)
S. 206C :Collection at source –Toll plaza does not include Tahbazari-Tahbazari does not come within ambit of S.206C(1C) –Order of Tribunal is set aside-Interpretation- Taxing provisions to be construed strictly .
Apar Mukhya Adhikari v. ITO (TDS) (2018) 258 Taxman 111 / 171 DTR 302/ 305 CTR 574/( 2019) 416 ITR 60 (All.)(HC)
S. 195A : Deduction at source – Net of tax -Deduction of tax at source- Gross amount of fees for technical services – Since obligation to pay tax was on university and assessee in terms of agreement, agreed to pay tax, same had to be necessarily added to income of university and therefore principle of grossing up had to be applied – DTAA-India-UK [ S. 2(24)(iva),9(1)(i), 90,201(1), 201(IA), Art. 13]
TVS Motor Co. Ltd. v. ITO (2018) 258 Taxman 77 /170 DTR 15 / 304 CTR 853/ (2019) 413 ITR 171 (Mad.)(HC)