S.147: Reassessment- Failure in computing income from outside India at a low rate – Reassessment was held to be valid [ S. 44BB, 148 ]
Invensys Process Systems (S) v. ADIT (2018) 252 Taxman 199 (Uttarakhand) (HC)S.147: Reassessment- Failure in computing income from outside India at a low rate – Reassessment was held to be valid [ S. 44BB, 148 ]
Invensys Process Systems (S) v. ADIT (2018) 252 Taxman 199 (Uttarakhand) (HC)S. 147 : Reassessment – Order was passed without following the principle of natural justice , therefore the matter was remitted back to income tax officer for fresh consideration [ S.44AB, 45 ]
Kovalam Santhana Krishnan Mohan v. ITO (2018) 404 ITR 597/252 Taxman 289 (Mad.)(HC)S. 147 : Reassessment –With in four years- Reassessment on basis of tangible material placed on record was held to be valid [ S.44BB(3), 92CA ]
Dolphin Drilling Ltd. v. ADIT (2018) 401 ITR 209/ 252 Taxman 181 (Uttarakhand)(HC)S. 147: Reassessment- Notice issued in name of deceased assessee — Objection raised by legal heir of deceased assessee before completion of reassessment — Notice was held to be null and void [ S. 148, 159, 292B, 292BB ]
Jaydeepkumar Dhirajlal Thakkar v. ITO (2018) 401 ITR 302/165 DTR 404 / 305 CTR 683 (Guj) (HC)S. 147: Reassessment —Natural justice -Order passed without disposing of objections raised by assessee for reopening was improper and null and void [ S. 143(2), 148 ]
Jayanthi Natarajan (Ms.) v. ACIT (2018) 401 ITR 215 / 300 CTR 225/ 161 DTR 281 (Mad) (HC)S. 147 : Reassessment –Educational institution-Availability of alternative statutory remedy – Writ was held to be not maintainable [ S. 10(23C)(vi),148, Art .226 ]
Annamalai University v. ITO (2018) 401 ITR 80/ 166 DTR 422 (Mad) (HC)S. 147 : Reassessment –Rejection of objection without assigning reasons was held to be bad in law [ S. 148 ]
Scan Holding P. Ltd. v. ACIT (2018) 402 ITR 290 / 169 DTR 334(Delhi) (HC)S. 147 : Reassessment –With in four years-Details of income submitted during scrutiny assessment-Reassessment notice based on same facts was held to be not valid .[ S. 148 ]
Giriraj Steel v. DCIT (2018) 402 ITR 204 (Guj) (HC)S. 147 : Reassessment –With in four years- Change of opinion – Transaction relating to subsequent year –Reassessment was held to be not justified .[ S. 2(15) 148 ]
Friends of WWB India v. DIT (2018) 402 ITR 350 (Guj) (HC)S. 147: Reassessment — Purchase and sale of shares — Accommodation entries – Reassessment rejecting the capital gain was held to be valid [ S. 143(3) 148 ]
Rajnish Jain. v. CIT (2018) 402 ITR 12/ 166 DTR 205 (All) (HC)