This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S.271D: Penalty-Takes or accepts any loan or deposit-Assessing Officer not recording satisfaction in assessment order that there had been violation of section 269SS-High Court quashed the penalty order-SLP dismissed.[S. 269SS, Art. 136]

PCIT v. Parivar Television Pvt. Ltd. (2025) 481 ITR 14 /(2026) 308 Taxman 186 (SC) Editorial : PCIT v. Parivar Television Pvt. Ltd (2025) 483 ITR 391/180 taxmann.co 109 (Guj)(HC)

S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty-Concealment-Not specifying the charge in the notice-None of relevant columns had been indicated nor had irrelevant columns been struck off-Penalty notice was invalid in law-SLP dismissed. [S. 274, Art. 136]

PCIT v. Shyam Sunder Jindal (2025) 481 ITR 568/ 304 Taxman 1 (SC) Editorial : PCIT v. Shyam Sunder Jindal(2023) 296 Taxman 115 / (2024) 462 ITR 501 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 263: Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Unsecured loans-AO raised queries, examined identity, creditworthiness and genuineness of creditors, and took a plausible view-General observation by PCIT without specific finding as to what inquiry was lacking-Revision order not sustainable. [S. 143(3), 153A]

PCIT v. Prabhu Poly Pipes Ltd. (2025) (2025) 481 ITR 503 / 176 taxmann.com 693 (Cal.) (HC) Editorial : PCIT v. Prabhu Poly Pipes Ltd. (2025) 481 ITR 506/306 Taxman 161 ((SC), SLP dismissed.

S. 263: Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-AO allowed deduction under section 54B after detailed inquiry-View taken by AO reasonable and plausible-Twin conditions for section 263 not fulfilled-Revision order not sustainable. [S. 54B, 260A]

PCIT v. Kanubhai Vanmalibhai Patel (2025)481 ITR 246 / [2025] 178 taxmann.com 133 (Guj.) (HC). Editorial : SLP of revenue dismissed, delay of 365 days, PCIT v. Kanubhai Vanmalibhai Patel (2025) 307 Taxman 6 (SC)

S. 254(1) : Appellate Tribunal-Powers-Expert opinion of technical matters-Inspection of factory to decide the matter-Not perverse or any excess of jurisdiction. [S. 260A]

CIT v. Ramco Cements Ltd. [2025] 481 ITR 705 / 173 taxmann.com 226 (Mad)(HC)

S. 245C : Settlement Commission-Settlement of cases-Conditions-Applications of petitioners were validly filed before ITSC which legally and factually existed, i.e., much before Finance Act, 2021 was promulgated on 1-4-2021-Application shall be treated as pending applications to be considered by Interim Board-Direction was issued to consider application. [S. 119(2)(b), 153A, 245C(1), 245C(5) Art. 226]

Megha Engineering and Infrastructure Ltd v. ITSC (2025) 481 ITR 356 / 179 taxmann.com 208 (Delhi)(HC) Western U.P. Power Transmission Co Ltd v. ITSC 2025) 481 ITR 356 / 179 taxmann.com 208 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 245C : Settlement Commission-Settlement of cases-Conditions-Abolition of Settlement Commission-Interim Board Settlement Commission inoperative from 1-2-2021-Application on 17-3-202, i.e., prior to date when assent of President of India had been received for Finance Act, 2021-Application was restored to file of Settlement Commission. [S. 24B. 245C(1), 245(5) Art. 226]

Pradeep Kumar Naredi. v. UOI (2025) 481 ITR 346 / 170 taxmann.com 715 (Cal) (HC) RSB Industries Ltd. v. UOI (2025) 481 ITR 346 / 170 taxmann.com 715 (Cal) (HC)

S. 244A : Refunds-Interest on refunds-Compensation of acquisition of agricultural land-Assessee neither made aware of deduction of tax at source nor issued form 16A by deductor-Delay in application for refund under circumstances beyond control of assessee Assessee-Entitled to interest on refund-SLP delay of 457 days-SLP dismissed on account of delay as well as on merits. [S.194LA, Art. 136]

PCIT v. Bhimjibhai Madhavjibhai Bharad (2025) 481 ITR 454/ 178 taxmann.com 7 (SC) Editorial : Mohanbhai Madhavjibhai Bharad v.PCIT (2024) 465 ITR 323 / 158 taxmann.com 13 (Guj)(HC)

S. 220 : Collection and recovery-Assessee deemed in default-CIT(A) allowed the appeal-Tribunal allowed the appeal of the revenue-Fresh notice of demand-Liability to interest commences from expiry of one month from second notice-CBDT-Circulars issued by Central Board not binding upon court-Circular No. 334, dated 3-4-1982(1982) 135 ITR 10 (St) [S. 119, 156,220(2) 254 (1), Art. 226]

Karnal Co-Op. Sugar Mills Ltd. v. CIT (2025) 481 ITR 303 /180 taxmann.com 19 (P &H) (HC)

S. 197 : Deduction at source-Certificate for lower rate-Software license agreement-Order set aside with directions to decide the application in accordance with the order of Dispute Resolution Panel and the order of Supreme Court-DTAA-India-USA [Art. 7, Art 226]

Openwave Mobility Inc v. Dy. CIT (2025) 481 ITR 570 (Delhi)(HC)