S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty-Concealment-Bonafide claim-Disallowance of interest-Order of Tribunal deleting the penalty is affirmed. [S. 36(1)(vii)]
PCIT v ICICI Bank Ltd [2024] 161 taxmann.com 454 (Bom) (HC)S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty-Concealment-Bonafide claim-Disallowance of interest-Order of Tribunal deleting the penalty is affirmed. [S. 36(1)(vii)]
PCIT v ICICI Bank Ltd [2024] 161 taxmann.com 454 (Bom) (HC)S. 268A: Appeal-Instructions-Circulars-Monetary limits-Enhancing monetary limits-Applicable to all pending appeals. [S. 253, 260A]
CIT v. Satish Kumar Agarwal (2024) 301 Taxman 335 (Raj)(HC)S. 264: Commissioner-Revision of other orders-Bonafide mistake-Subsequent to the assessment –Not filed revised return-Over assessed-Commissioner has the power to grant the relief-Rejection order of CIT is quashed and set aside and directed to decide on merit.[S.43B, 139(5), 143(1), 143(3) Art, 226]
Bahar Infocons (P.) Ltd. v. PCIT (2024) 301 Taxman 349 /341 CTR 705 / 243 DTR 417 / (2025) 476 ITR 615 (Bom)(HC)S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue –
Denial of exemption-Trust or institution-Investment restrictions-Jurisdictional High Court in favour of assessee when the Assessing Officer has passed the order-Revision order is quashed-Order of Tribunal is affirmed. [S. 2(15), 13(8) 143(3), 260A]
S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Method of accounting-Once order under S. 263 became final and stood quashed-No question can arise of passing another order as it will be invalid in eyes of law. [S. 143(3), 145, 260A]
PCIT v. North Eastern Electric Power Corporation Ltd. [2024] 469 ITR 4 /164 taxmann.com 307 (Meghalaya)(HC).S. 254(2): Appellate Tribunal-Rectification of mistake apparent from the record –Limited scrutiny for verification of cash deposits during demonetization period-Revision order is quashed by the Tribunal-Rectification application of Revenue is rejected-Order of Tribunal rejecting the rectification application is affirmed. [S.68 69C, 115BBE,263, Art. 226]
PCIT v. Green Park (2024) 301 Taxman 617 (Guj.)(HC)S. 250 : Appeal-Commissioner (Appeals)-Procedure-Assessment against dead person-Legal heirs-No notice was served on the legal heirs-Order is set aside-CIT(A) is directed to hear the appeal a fresh.[S.143(3), 159, Art. 226]
Sitaram Raikwar v. NFAC (2024) 301 Taxman 528 (MP)(HC)S. 245D : Settlement Commission-Settlement of cases-Procedure-Application-Scope of provision-Power of ITSC to pass an order not limited only to aspects covered by application of settlement preferred by the assessee-ITSC empowered to render decision on issues which find mention in report of CIT-Order of Settlement Commission is affirmed.[S. 153A, 245C, 245D(4), Art. 226]
Harsh Dhanuka HUF v. PCIT (2024) 469 ITR 162 / 164 taxmann.com 193/341 CTR 154 (Delhi)(HC)S. 240 : Refunds-Appeal –Order of Tribunal-Refund denied- Revenue is bound to refund amount to the Assessee with interest as per the provisions of Section 240 and there is no onus on the part of the Assessee to complete any formality for the amount of refund due-Non-functionality of TRACES Portal is not a ground for denying benefit arising out of statutory provision under the Act. [S.201(1)(201(IA), 254(1), Form Non26B, Art. 226]
Birla Corporation Ltd. v. PCIT (2024) 301 Taxman 357 (MP)(HC)S. 206AA :Requirement to furnish Permanent Account Number-Provisions of the Income-Tax Act, 1961 cannot override Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement.[S.90, 260A]
CIT (IT) v. Edgeverse Systems Ltd. [2024] 469 ITR 267 (Karn)(HC)