This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws
S. 79 : Carry forward and set off losses-Change in share holdings-Companies which public are not substantial interested-Beneficially held more than 51 per cent of voting powers in both the years-The year in which the loss is incurred and the year in which the loss is sought to be set off-Share holding of one share holder is increased from 40 percent to 85 percent-Set off of brought forward losses is allowable.
Hiranandani Health Care (P) Ltd. v. CIT(A)(2023) 225 TTJ 397 /157 taxmann.com 551 (Mum)(Trib)
S. 69C : Unexplained expenditure-Survey-Loose papers-Cash expenses-Unexplained receipts and expenditure-Order of CIT(A) is affirmed. [ S. 133A]
Dy. CIT v. Rajnikant Prabhudas Mandavia (2023) 157 taxmann.com 316 / 226 TTJ 778 (Ahd)(Trib.)
S. 69A : Unexplained money-Sale of land-Share holders-Unaccounted cash-Addition is deleted.
Dy.CIT v. Shailesh Jivalal Jogani (2023) 225 TTJ 712 (Mum)(Trib)
S. 69 : Unexplained investments-Income from undisclosed sources-Gift-Father and mother-Affidavits-Accepted as genuine-Gift from grand mother-Failure to produce evidence-Addition is affirmed. [ S.68]
Hemant Pandya v. ITO(2023) 224 TTJ 610 (Indore)(Trib)
S. 69 : Unexplained investments-Genuineness of purchases-Parties have not filed the return-No confirmation from the books of account of those parties-Addition is affirmed.
ACIT v. Meerut Roller Flour Mills (P) Ltd (2023) 225 TTJ 75 (UO)/ 157 taxmann.com 463 (Delhi)(Trib)
S. 69 : Unexplained investments-Cash deposits-Sale of unbranded electric items-Profit is estimated at 10% on alleged unaccounted business.
Harish Kumar Chhabada v. Dy. CIT (2023) 225 TTJ 26 (UO) (Raipur)(Trib)
S. 69 : Unexplained investments-Unrecorded sales-Only gross profit is estimated-Cash deposited in banks-When profit is estimated further addition is deleted-Reassessment is held to be valid. [ S. 147, 148]
ITO v. Rutuja Ispat (P) Ltd (2023) 225 TTJ 1000 (Pune)(Trib)
S. 68 : Cash credits-Cash deposited in bank account-Demonetisation-Manufacture of gold and diamond jewellery-Currency notes-No defects in the books of account-Deletion of addition is affirmed. [ S. 145]
Dy.CIT v. Bawa Jewellers (P) Ltd (2023) 224 TTJ 705 (Delhi)(Trib)
S. 68 : Cash credits-Share application-Proved identity and capacity of the investors-Addition is deleted.
Dy.CIT v. Devi Iron & Power (P) Ltd (2023) 224 TTJ 59 (Raipur)(Trib)
S. 68 : Cash credits-Search and Seizure-Remand report-Copies of balance sheets acknowledgement of documents of lenders such as IT return bank statements PAN card etc-Addition made without giving an opportunity of cross examination is deleted. [ S. 131]
ACIT v. Rukhana Enterprises (2023) 224 TTJ 29 (UO) (Mum)(Trib)