This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S. 37(1): Business expenditure-Provision for discount-Order of Tribunal allowing the claim is affirmed. [S.260A]

PCIT v. LTI Mindtree Ltd. (2025) 307 Taxman 25 (Karn.)(HC)

S. 37(1): Business expenditure-Licence fee-Use of goodwill-Travelling and entertainment expenses-Ad-hoc disallowance of 5 per cent-Provision for discount-Order of Tribunal deleting the disallowance is affirmed.[S. 260A]

PCIT v. Remfry and Sagar (2025) 307 Taxman 490 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 37(1): Business expenditure-lease of plot-Long-term lease of 99 years-Development charges-Deduction allowable at 5% of contribution towards the development charges at the end of each year-Allowable as revenue expenditure.[S. 260A]

Hinduja Foundries Ltd. v. ACIT (2025) 307 Taxman 336 /(2026) 486 ITR 117 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 35: Scientific research-Agreement was granted on 17-6-2009 from 1-4-2007-Order of the High Court affirming the disallowance is affirmed-SLP dismissed earlier and refiled once again by a delay of 1251 days is also dismissed. [S. 35(2AB), Art. 136]

Apollo Tyres Ltd. v. ACIT (2025) 307 Taxman 170 (SC) Editorial : Apollo Tyres Ltd. v. ACIT(2022) 284 Taxman 687 (Ker)(HC)

S. 32 : Depreciation-Assets discarded-Entitle to depreciation-Order of Tribunal affirmed. [S. 260A]

PCIT v. Sony India (P.) Ltd. (2025) 307 Taxman 173 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 32 : Depreciation-lease of plot-Long-term lease of 99 years-Plot deposit-Depreciation not allowable. [S. 32(1)(ii), 260A]

Hinduja Foundries Ltd. v. ACIT (2025) 307 Taxman 336 /(2026) 486 ITR 117 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 28(i): Business income-Income from other sources-Interest income on a loan given to staff-Matter remanded to the Assessing Officer-Order of Tribunal affirmed.[S. 56, 260A]

PCIT v. Paschim Gujarat Vij Company Ltd. (2025) 307 Taxman 572 (Guj.)(HC)

S. 12A : Registration-Trust or institution-Benefit of a particular religious community or caste, i.e., ‘Leuva Patel’ community-Provisions of section 13 could be invoked only at the time of assessment and not at the time of grant of registration-Remanded matter back to Commissioner (E) for reconsideration-Order of Tribunal affirmed. [S.12AB, 13, 260A]

CIT (E) v. Bhojaram Leuva Patel Seva Samaj Trust (2025) 307 Taxman 86 (Guj.)(HC)

S. 2(1A) : Agricultural income-Cultivation and sale of white button mushrooms-High court held that the assessee is not entitled to exemption-Notice was to be issued in SLP filed by assessee against the order of High Court. [S. 10(1)]

British Agro Products (India) (P.) Ltd. v. PCIT (2025) 307 Taxman 1 (SC) Editorial : Notice issued in SLP filed by the assessee, PCIT v. British Agro Products (India) (P.) Ltd (2025) 175 taxmann.com 618 (Mad)(HC)

Interpretation of taxing statutes-Strict interpretation-Precedent-Judgment based on old, broader law cannot be used to interpret new, stricter provision.[S.36(1)(vii)]

National Co-Operative Development Corporation v. ACIT (2026) 484 ITR 193/ 308 Taxman 168 / 348 CTR 83 (SC) Editorial : Editorial : National Co-operative Development Corporation v. ACIT [2012] 204 Taxman 6 /[2013] 356 ITR 184 (Delhi) (HC) affirmed.