This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S. 4 : Charge of income-tax-Block of assets-Assessee reducing Block of assets from item and claimed depreciation on reduced Block of asset — Addition is not sustainable.[S. 2(11)]

ITO v. Umed Meghraj Jain (2023)108 ITR 58 (SN) (Ahd) (Trib)

S. 4 : Charge of income-tax-Interest received on deposits in Consolidated fund of India-Not chargeable to tax-Directed the Assessing Officer to verify the facts.[S.143(3)]

Dy. CIT v. National Highways And Infrastructure Development Corp India (2023)108 ITR 21 (SN)/2024) 204 ITR 1/ 227 TTJ 1 (UO) (Delhi)(Trib)

S. 4 : Charge of income-tax-Principle of mutuality — Payments were reimbursement and exempt from taxation and covered by principle of mutuality.

Dy. CIT (IT) v. Deloitte Touche Tohmastu (2023)108 ITR 577 (Delhi) (Trib)

S. 4 : Charge of income-tax-Capital or revenue-Duty credit entitlement under served from India Scheme-credit only be utilised by set off against duties arising on purchase of capital goods or spare-Capital in nature.[S. 28(i), 32, 43(1)]

Chennai Container Terminal P. Ltd v. Dy. CIT(2023) 108 ITR 147 / 154 taxmann.com 68 (Mum)(Trib)

S. 2(22)(d) : Dividend-Any distribution to its share holders on the reduction of its share capital-Buy back of shares-Scheme of arrangement or compromise-There was a capital reduction and distribution out of accumulated profit of company to its shareholders, same would entail release of all or part of assets of a company on reduction of capital and would attract provisions of section 2(22)(d), and consequently, assessee was liable for payment of DDT under section 115-O. [S. 115O, 115QA, Companies Act 1956, S. 77, 77A 100 to104, 391, 292, 393]

Cognizant Technology Solutions India (P.) Ltd v. ACIT (2023) 108 ITR 492 / 154 taxmann.com 309 (Chennai)(Trib)

S. 271D : Penalty-Takes or accepts any loan or deposit-Ignorance of law and bona fides-Non-Resident directors not material-Not mere technical violation in case of companies-Levy of penalty Justified. [S.269SS, 269T, 271E]

Sofitra Impex P. Ltd. v. Asst. CIT (2023)107 ITR 52 (SN)(Delhi) (Trib)

S. 271AA : Penalty-Failure to keep and maintain books of accounts-Documents-International transaction-Transfer pricing-Non-compliance of provisions occurred due to opinion given by Chartered Accountant-Reasonable cause-Penalty unsustainable.[S.40A(2)(b), 92D, 92E, 273B]

Jyoti Paper Udyog Ltd. v. Asst. CIT (2023)107 ITR 16 (SN)(Pune) (Trib)

S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty-Concealment-Additional depreciation-Claim not sustained by authorities-Penalty is not leviable.[S. 32]

Heidelberg Cement India Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2023)107 ITR 49 (SN)(Delhi) (Trib)

S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty-Concealment-Prosecution on same facts quashed-No ground for levy of penalty. [S. 276C(1), 276D, 277]

Pradip Burman v.Dy. CIT (2023)107 ITR 59 (SN)(Delhi) (Trib)

S. 270A : Penalty for under-reporting and misreporting of income-Income tax refund-Offered in the course of assessment-Non-declaration of interest cannot be said to be under-reporting of Income. [S. 143(3), 274]

Kavita Jasjit Singh v. CIT (2023)107 ITR 1 (SN) (Mum) (Trib)