S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Remittances to non-resident-Import of raw materials-Deduction of tax at source-Tribunal setting aside the order of Commissioner-Commissioner cannot make addition without directing the Assessing Officer to re-examine issue. [S. 40(a)(ia), 195, 254, 260A]

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Remittances to non-resident-Import of raw materials-Deduction of tax at source-Tribunal setting aside the order of Commissioner-Commissioner cannot make addition without directing the Assessing Officer to re-examine issue-Order of High Court is affirmed-SLP of Revenue is dismissed. [S. 40(a)(ia), 195, 254, Art. 136.]

S.260A : Appeal-High Court-Reassessment-Matter is remanded to the Assessing Officer-Over due interest-Non forming asset-Question of fact.[S. 36(1)(viia) 43D, 147, 148]

S. 260A : Appeal-High Court-Reassessment-Matter is remanded to the Assessing Officer-Over due interest-Non forming asset-Question of fact-SLP is dismissed-Assessee at liberty to avail of remedy of legacy dispute resolution. [S. 36(1)(viia), 43D, 147, 148, Art. 136]

S. 254(1) : Appellate Tribunal-Powers-Ex-parte order by CIT(A)-Tribunal set a side the matter to decide on merits-The assessee trying to use technical reasons-Appeal is dismissed. [S. 147, 255 (8), 263, 260A]

S. 254(1) : Appellate Tribunal-Powers-Ex-parte order by CIT(A)-Tribunal set a side the matter to decide on merits-The assessee trying to use technical reasons-Appeal is dismissed-SLP of assessee is dimissed. [S. 147, 255 (8), 263,Art. 136]

S. 245C : Settlement Commission-Settlement of cases-Conditions-Application was filed on 30-3-2021-CBDT’s press release giving taxpayers an opportunity to file application for settlement by 30-9-2021-Eligible application though filed after 31-1-2021-Pending application which is required to be considered as pending application for adjudication on merits.[S.153A, 245B, 245D, 245D, 245F, Art. 226]

S. 226 : Collection and recovery-Modes of recovery-Matter pending before CIT(A)-Stayed further recovery of proceedings till the disposal of the appeal. [S. 143(3) 254, 263, Art. 226]

S. 226 : Collection and recovery-Modes of recovery-Tax recovery officer-Reassessment-Strictures-After period of seventeen years-Auction by Income tax Authority-Tax recovery officer-Hindu undivided family-Pendency of appeal-Fictitious demand-Auction is nullity-TRO should cancel recovery certificate on being informed that payment had been made by concerned defaulter-Directed to pay the compensation-Where a reference has been admitted by High Court against an order of Tribunal, prudence demands to keep away from conducting auction of properties for purpose of recovery-An auction conducted under the Income-tax Act, 1961 cannot be put on the same footing as that of an auction being conducted for execution of a decree by the Court or elsewhere in public as it would be in clear distinction of income-tax default auction-Income tax department is directed to pay cost of Rs 1 lakh to the petitioner. [S. 147, 224, 225(3), 256(1), 256(2), Transfer of Property Act, 1882, S 52, Rule 56,60,61, 62, of schedule, Art. 226, 300A]

S. 158BA : Block assessment-Undisclosed income-Unexplained money-Shares-Block assessment-Assessment has to be made on actual undisclosed income and not on notional basis-The submission that the amount involved is below monitory limit is also not accepted-Matter remanded to the Assessing Officer.[S. 69A, 132, 158B(b), 158BC, 260A, 268A]