This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S. 57 : Income from other sources-Deductions Secured debentures-Interest income during pre-commencement period-Entire investment was out of borrowed funds-Interest expenditure is allowable as deduction. [S.56, 57(iii)]

Muthoot Agri Projects & Hospitalities (P) Ltd. v. ACIT (2024) 229 TTJ 468 / 237 DTR 220 / 38 NYPTTJ 439/ 164 taxmann.com 59 (Cochin)(Trib)

S. 56 : Income from other sources-Difference between purchase consideration and valuation made by DVO-An anti-avoidance provision-No infirmity in valuation report-There is no provision in the Act that before invoking the provisions of s. 56(2), the AO or the CIT(A) should prove with evidence that there is a transaction of on-money and then only addition can be made-Order of CIT(A) is affirmed. [S.56(2)(x)(b)]

West End Investment & Finance Consultancy Ltd. v. DCIT (2024) 229 TTJ 738 / 236 DTR 313 / 38 NYPTTJ 245/ 160 taxmann.com 679 (Mum) (Trib)

S.54F : Capital gains-Investment in a residential house-Notarized Will-Sale of inherited jewellery-The Assessing Officer cannot ask the evidence beyond time specified in R. 6F(5)-Directed the assessee to reconcile the quantum of jewellery with the valuation report, matter remanded to the CIT(A) [S. 45, 56, R.6F(5)]

ACIT v. Sharada Narayanan (2024) 229 TTJ 774 / 238 DTR 229 / 38 NYPTTJ 485 (Bang)(Trib)

S. 50C : Capital gains-Full value of consideration-Capital asset-Stamp valuation-sale of leasehold rights in land-Industrial plot of land was allotted by MIDC under a lease agreement-Provision of S.50C is not applicable-Value of industrial plot of land was less than actual consideration-First and second proviso is applicable.[S.2(14), 45, 50C(1)]

DCIT v. A.R. Sulphonates (P) Ltd.(2024) 229 TTJ 331 / 237 DTR 73 / 38 NYPTTJ 364 / 161 taxmann.com 451 (Kol) (Trib)

S. 40(a)(ia): Amounts not deductible-Deduction at source-Short deduction of TDS-No disallowance can be made-Action can be taken under section 201. [S. 194C, 194J]

ACIT v Vizag Seaport (P) Ltd. (2024) 229 TTJ 73) (UO) (Visakha (Trib)

S. 36(1)(iii) : Interest on borrowed capital-Capital work in progress-Out of own funds-No disallowance of interest can be made on borrowed amount.[S. 37(1)]

ACIT v. Vizag Seaport (P) Ltd. (2024) 229 TTJ 73) (UO) (Visakha (Trib)

S. 32AD: Investment in new plant or machinery in notified back ward areas in certain States-Effective date of commencement of provisions of S. 32AD and Notification No. 61/2016/F.No. 142/13/2015, dt. 20th July, 2016-Memorandum Explaining the Provisions in the Finance Bill, 2015 as well as the CBDT Circular No. 19 of 2015, dt. 27th Nov., 2015 clearly mention that the provisions of S 32AD are applicable from asst. year 2016-17 for a period of five years. The provisions of S. 32AD are applicable for the investment made in financial year 2015-16 i.e. AY. 2016-17.

Maheswari Mining & Energy (P) Ltd. v. DCIT (2024) 229 TTJ 121 / 236 DTR 321 / 38 NYPTTJ 402/ 162 taxmann.com 574 (TM ) (Hyd) (Trib)

S. 12AB: Procedure for fresh registration-Not registered under Rajasthan Public Trust Act, 1959-Fair chance should be given to cure the defect-Both the appeals relating to registration under S. 12AA and 80G are restored to the CIT(E) for afresh consideration.[S. 12AA, 80G]

Pacific Medicare Academy v. CIT (E) (2024) 229 TTJ 129 (UO) / 166 taxmann.com 245 (Jodhpur )(Trib)

S. 12AA : Procedure for registration-Trust or institution-Hospital-Letting of shops-Income is used for the objects of the Trust-Cancellation of registration is not valid. [S.12A, 12AA(3)]

Jodhpur Medical Research Centre v. CIT (E) (2024) 229 TTJ 909 / 239 DTR 9 / 38 NYPTTJ 600 / 166 taxmann.com 165 (Jodhpur ) (Trib)

S. 12A : Registration-Trust or institution–Service of show cause notice under S. 12A(1)(ac) (iii) by putting on e-portal only-Notice not served on the registered email id of the assessee as per the provisions of S. 282 of the Act-Rejecting of application is not valid-Application filed in Form No 10B cannot be sustained-Application is restored back to CIT(E ) to decide on merits. [S. 12A(1)(ac)(iii), 282, Form No 10AB]

Shamshan Sewa Samiti v. CIT (2024) 220 TTJ 113 (UO) (Amritsar ) (Trib) Shri Shri Maa Sundeshan Ji Mahraj Shri Hari Darbar Society v.CIT (2024) 220 TTJ 113 (UO) (Amritsar ) (Trib)