S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Failure to specify exact purpose of accumulation of income-Purpose of accumulation not beyond objects of assessee-Revision is not justified.[S.11(2), 142(1), 143(3), Form No 10.]

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Failing to furnish required information-No further enquiry-Revision is justified. [S. 143(3)]

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Business income-Survey-Statement in the course survey-Assessment order is passed due application of mind-No findings recorded by Principal Commissioner how deeming provisions applicable-Survey at business premises alone cannot be basis for revision.[S.68, 69 69A 69B 69C, 69D 115BBE, 133A, 143(3)]

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Firm-Remuneration to partners-Book profits-interest income not excluded while determining allowable deduction of remuneration to partners-Interest income business income-Deduction admissible-Central Board Of Direct Taxes Circular No. 12 Of 2019, Dated 19-6-2019-Revision is quashed. [S. 40(b)(v)]

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Share premium-Discounted cash flow method-Revenue could not compel assessee to choose particular method of valuation-Revision order is quashed. [S. 56(2(viib), 143(3), R.11U, 11UA]

S. 254(2): Appellate Tribunal-Rectification of mistake apparent from the record-Application is filed after five months from period of extension granted and six months after original order-Delay is not condoned.

S. 251 : Appeal-Commissioner (Appeals)-Powers-Sundry creditors-Matter restoring back to Assessing Officer to make further enquiries is affirmed. [S. 246A,250, 251(1)(a)]

S. 250 : Appeal-Commissioner (Appeals)-Procedure-Passing order merely stating wrong facts by cut paste from other assessee’s record-Matter remanded to Commissioner (Appeals) for adjudication afresh in accordance with law.[S. 249]

S. 206C : Collection at source-Trading-Alcoholic liquor-Forest produce-Scrap-Limitation-Assessment year 2012-13-Assessing Officer ought to have assessed order under section 206C(6A) on or before 31-3-2016-Order barred by limitation-Penalty-Failure to collect tax at source-Quantum appeal quashed-Penalty cannot be levied. [S. 206C(7),271CA]

S. 154 : Rectification of mistake-Mistake apparent from the record-Corporate social responsibility-Disallowance is not justified-The Assessing Officer is directed to rectify the mistakes under section 154 within three months. [S. 40(a)(ia), 143(1)]