This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S. 44BBA : Aircraft-Non-residents-Computation-Operation of aircraft-Presumptive taxation-Service tax collected on behalf of Government-Not includible in gross receipts.

Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd. v. Asst. CIT (2025) 129 ITR 51 (Trib.) Hong Kong Dragon Airlines Ltd. v. Asst. CIT (2025) 129 ITR 51 (Trib.)

S. 40A(3) : Business expenditure-Cash payments exceeding prescribed limit-Purchase of copra through agents-Payments made through banking channels-Disallowance deleted.

Dy. CIT v. WD and Sons P. Ltd. (2025) 129 ITR 278 (Chennai) (Trib.)

S. 40(a)(ii) : Amounts not deductible-Rates or tax-Education cess-Forms part of tax-Deduction not allowable.

Honda Motorcycle and Scooter India Pvt. Ltd. v. Asst. CIT [2023] 153 taxmann.com 567 / (2025) 129 ITR 6 (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 40(a)(ii) : Amounts not deductible-Rates or tax-State taxes paid overseas-Not eligible for relief under sections 90 or 91-Deduction allowable.[S.37(1), 90, 91]

Tata Consultancy Services Ltd. v. Dy. CIT [2023] 154 taxmann.com 372 / (2025) 129 ITR 667 (Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 40(a)(ia) : Amounts not deductible-Tax deduction at source-Labour charges-Payments made through head labourer-Labourers directly employed by assessee-No contract-Disallowance deleted. [S. 194C]

Dy. CIT v. WD and Sons P. Ltd. (2025) 129 ITR 278 (Chennai) (Trib.)

S. 40(a)(ia): Amounts not deductible-Deduction at source-Year-end provisions-Vendors not identifiable-Liability to deduct tax arises only on identification of payee-Disallowance deleted.[S.37(1), 145]

Tata Consultancy Services Ltd. v. Dy. CIT [2023] 154 taxmann.com 372 / (2025) 129 ITR 667 (Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 40(a)(ia): Amounts not deductible-Deduction at source-Commission paid to non-resident agents-Services rendered outside India-No business connection or permanent establishment in India-No tax deductible at source.[S.9(1)(i), 195]

Tata Consultancy Services Ltd. v. Dy. CIT [2023] 154 taxmann.com 372 / (2025) 129 ITR 667 (Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 40(a)(i) : Amounts not deductible-Tax deduction at source-Reimbursement of debtor collection charges-No permanent establishment-Not royalty or fees for technical services-No tax deductible at source-Reimbursement of legal expenses-Pure reimbursement-Matter remanded for verification-No double taxation.[S. 9(1)(vii), 195]

UPS Express P. Ltd. v. Asst. CIT (2025) 129 ITR 381 (Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 40(a)(i): Amounts not deductible-Deduction at source-Non-resident-Royalty-Software purchased for resale-Right to use copyrighted article and not copyright-Payment not royalty-No tax deductible at source.[S.9(1)(vi), 195]

Tata Consultancy Services Ltd. v. Dy. CIT [2023] 154 taxmann.com 372 / (2025) 129 ITR 667 (Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Foreign travel expenses-Directors’ visit to overseas subsidiaries for promotion of business-Commercial expediency-Allowable-Irrecoverable excise duty on sales returns-Expenditure incurred for business purposes-Allowable-Gift and gardening expenses-Expenditure incurred for business purposes-Allowable-Prior period expenses-Assessee unable to establish crystallisation of liability during relevant year-Disallowance upheld.

AVTEC Ltd. v. Asst. CIT [2024] 168 taxmann.com 692 / (2025) 129 ITR 483 (Delhi)(Trib.)