S. 139 : Return of income-Private discretionary trust-Status of individual-Central Board of Direct Taxes has authority to Prescribe proper form-Court cannot direct Board. [R. 112, Art. 226]
Mahesh Family Trust v. ITO (2023)459 ITR 739 (Mad)(HC)S. 139 : Return of income-Private discretionary trust-Status of individual-Central Board of Direct Taxes has authority to Prescribe proper form-Court cannot direct Board. [R. 112, Art. 226]
Mahesh Family Trust v. ITO (2023)459 ITR 739 (Mad)(HC)S. 132B : Application of seized or requisitioned assets- Search and seizure-Adjustment of cash seized from third person Application for such adjustment is mandatory.[S. 132, Art. 226]
Irfanudeen Abdul Munaf v. PDIT (Inv) (2023) 459 ITR 566 (Mad)(HC)S. 132 : Search and seizure-Reason to believe-Adequacy of reasons not within scope of judicial review-Writ petition dismissed. [S. 69, 131, 132(1)(bb), 133A]
Sheetal Bamalwa v. UOI (2023)459 ITR 570 (Gauhati)(HC)S. 115JB : Company-Book profit-Set-off of Loss or unabsorbed depreciation-Entitled to claim set off.
PCIT v. Bangalore International Airport Ltd. (2023)459 ITR 158 /154 taxmann.com 394 (Karn)(HC)S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Avoidance of tax-International transaction-Specified domestic transaction-Resale price method-Matter remanded to Transfer Pricing Officer for fresh determination of Arm’s Length Price. [S.92CA(3)]
Shasun Pharmaceuticals Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2023)459 ITR 440/(2022) 142 taxmann.com 457 (Mad)(HC)S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Avoidance of tax-International transaction-Specified domestic transaction-Advertising, marketing and promotion expenditure-Principle of consistency applies-Order of Tribunal is affirmed. [S. 92]
PCIT v. Wrigley India Pvt. Ltd. (2023)459 ITR 2 /156 taxmann.com 245 (Delhi)(HC)S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Avoidance of tax-International transaction-Specified domestic transaction-Rejection of comparables based on findings of fact in respect of functional dissimilarities-Interest on receivables-Working capital-Remanding the matter to Assessing Officer-Order of Tribunal is affirmed. [S. 260A]
PCIT v. Qualcomm India Pvt. Ltd. (2023)459 ITR 9 /156 taxmann.com 288 (Delhi)(HC)S. 148A: Reassessment – Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice – Information must be definite and not vague – Validity of notice can be challenged by filing writ petition .[ S. 147 , 148, 148A(b) 148A(d) , Art. 226 ]
Alkem Laboratories Ltd. v . PCIT (2023)459 ITR 551 /152 taxmann.com 133 / 333 CTR 793 (Pat)(HC)S. 80P : Co-operative societies-Claim for deduction must be made in return filed within time-Return Non est-Not eligible for deduction. [S.80AC, 80A(5), 139(1), 139(4), 142(1)), 148]
Nileshwar Range Kallu Chethu Vyavasaya Thozhilali Sahakarana Sangham v. CIT (2023)459 ITR 730/152 taxmann.com 347 / 333 CTR 655(Ker)(HC)S. 80P : Co-operative societies-Banking business-Interest earned from funds utilised for statutory reserves-Entitle to deduction. [S. 80P(2)(a)(i)]
CIT v. Paschim Banga Gramin Bank (2023)459 ITR 491/(2024) 158 taxmann.com 460 (Cal)(HC)