S. 144B : Faceless assessment-Vested right to personal hearing-If it has been requested for-Order was quashed and set aside. [S. 144B(7)(viii), Art. 226]
DLF Emporio Ltd v. NFAC (2023) 291 Taxman 455 (Delhi)(HC)S. 144B : Faceless assessment-Vested right to personal hearing-If it has been requested for-Order was quashed and set aside. [S. 144B(7)(viii), Art. 226]
DLF Emporio Ltd v. NFAC (2023) 291 Taxman 455 (Delhi)(HC)S. 144 : Best judgment assessment-Principle of natural justice-Order set aside. [S. 144B, Art. 226]
Sudhakar v. ACIT (2023) 291 Taxman 183 (Karn.)(HC)S. 143(3) : Assessment-Jurisdictional issue-Notice issued by an authority who had no jurisdiction at relevant time-Participated in the proceedings-Issue of notice under section 143(2) is not procedural irregularity-Order of Tribunal quashing the order was up held. [S. 143(2), 292BB]
PCIT v. Cosmat Traders (P.) Ltd. (2022) 291 Taxman 6 (Cal)(HC) Editorial: Order of Tribunal in Cosmat Traders (P) Ltd v. ITO (2021) 189 ITD 504 (Kol)(Trib) is affirmed.S. 143(2) : Assessment-Notice-Fringe benefits tax-Notice issued after six months from end of relevant financial year-Order of Tribunal quashing the assessment order was affirmed.[S. 115WE, 158BC]
PCIT v. GJ Trading (P.) Ltd. (2023) 291 Taxman 152 (Telangana)(HC)S. 127 : Transfer of case-No show cause notice was issued-Matter remanded to Commissioner for passing speaking order after affording opportunity of hearing.[S. 148, 148A(d), Art, 226]
Nouvelle Advisory Services (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT (2023) 291 Taxman 583 / 331 CTR 235/ 223 DTR 145 (Cal)(HC) Editorial: Order of single judge is modified,Order of single judge is modified , Nouvelle Advisory Services (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT (2023) 331 CTR 239/ 223 DTR 449( Cal )( HC) W.P.A. No. 25453 of 2022 dt.24-11-2022.S. 119: Central Board of Direct Taxes-Application for condonation-Return-Bonafide reasons-Delay in filing of return was condoned-Allowed to file the return within specified time. [S.119(2b), 139(1), Art. 226]
Combined Tracom (P.) Ltd. v. UOI (2023) 291 Taxman 9 (Karn)(HC)S. 92B : Transfer pricing-Corporate guarantee-Overseas Associated Enterprises-Matter remanded by the Tribunal-Amendment made to provisions of section 92B, by the Finance Act,2012 with retrospective effect from 1-4-2002-Order of High Court which affirmed the order of tribunal is affirmed-SLP of the assessee is dismissed [S.92C, Art. 136]
Jubilant Pharmova Ltd v. Add.CIT (2023) 291 Taxman 439 (SC) Jubilant Pharmova Ltd v. Add.CIT (2023)458 ITR 172 / 291 Taxman 527 (SC) Editorial: Refer Jubilant Pharmova Ltd v. Add.CIT (2023) 146 taxmann.com 319 (All)(HC). Jubilant Pharmova Ltd v. Add.CIT (2023) 146 taxmann.com 222 /458 ITR 170 (All)(HC).S. 89 : Relief for income-tax-Arrears or advance of salary-Order of High Court decision was not available when the order was passed-Order of High Court was available subsequently-Entitle for the relief.[.S.10(10C), 264, Art, 226]
N.S.R Murthy v. CIT (2023) 291 Taxman 580 / 333 CTR 869(Telangana) (HC)S. 80IB(10) : Housing projects-Approved plan of Municipal Authority-All flats were having built up area of less than 1000 square feet-Completion certificate was issued by competent Authority-Order of Tribunal allowing the deduction was affirmed. [S. 80IB(10), 260A]
PCIT v. Vardhan Builders (2022) 291 Taxman 450/(2023) 456 ITR 310 (Bom.)(HC)Editorial : SLP dismissed ( 2023) PCIT v. Vardhan Builders ( 2023 256 taxmann.com. 364 ( SC)S. 69A : Unexplained money-Failure to produce books of account-Justified in making addition.[S.133(6), 145]
Dhansukhlal Jekisondas (HUF) v. ITO (2023) 456 ITR 650/291 Taxman 486 (Guj) (HC)