This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws
S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Industrial undertaking-Himachal Pradesh-Audit report filed physically before filing of return-Deposit of cash-Demonetisation period-Detailed filed in the course of assessment proceedings-Revision is held to be not valid.[S.80IA(7), 80IC, 80IE (6), 143(3)]
Control Print Ltd v. PCIT (2023) 102 ITR 5 (SN)(Mum)(Trib)
S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Survey-Surrender of income-Commissioner cannot look again at same information-Revision is quashed.[S.133A, 143(3)]
Kashmiri Lal Gupta v.PCIT (2023)102 ITR 1 / 224 TTJ 370(Chd)(Trib) Gupta Electrico v.PCIT (2023)102 ITR 1/ 224 TTJ 370 (Chd)(Trib)
S. 251 : Appeal-Commissioner (Appeals)-Powers-Additional grounds-Lease expenditure-Revised computation-Not justified in refusing admission-Matter remanded to the CIT(A).[S. 37(1)]
Spicejet Ltd. v. Add. CIT (2023)102 ITR 58 (Delhi)(Trib)
S. 194A : Deduction at source-Interest other than interest on securities-S. 194A : Deduction at source-Interest other than interest on securities-Non deduction of TDS on year-end provision-Suo moto disallowance of expenditure u/s 40(a)(ia)-liability to deduct tax at source u/s 194A exists-levy of interest u/s 201(1A) –Failure to identify the payees-Matter remanded.[S.40(a)(i), 40(a)(ia),191, 201 (1), 201(IA)]
Biocon Ltd. v. DCIT (2023) 102 ITR 485 (Bang)(Trib)
S. 154 : Rectification of mistake-Mistake apparent from the record-CPC while processing the return of income in as much as depreciation u/s 32 has not been granted-Entitled for the claim of depreciation. [S.32]
Indauto Filters v. ACIT (2023) 102 ITR 403 (Bang) (Trib.)
S. 154 : Rectification of mistake-Mistake apparent from the record-Time limit-Barred by limitation-Merit also eligible deduction. [S.80IA, 143(3) 154(7)]
Ultratech Cement Ltd. v. ACIT (2023) 102 ITR 33 (SN) (Mum) (Trib.)
S. 154 : Rectification of mistake-Mistake apparent from the record-Deduction of tax at source-Credit for-Intimation-Directed to grant relief after verification. [S.143(1), 199,Form, 26AS]
Kalyaniwalla and Mistry LlP v. ACIT (2023)102 ITR 47 (SN)(Mum)(Trib)
S. 151 : Reassessment-Sanction for issue of notice-Mechanical sanction-Reassessment is quashed.[S.147(b), 148]
Sunil Sahu v. ACIT [2023] 221 TTJ 631/ 222 DTR 186 (Indore)(Trib)
S. 148 : Reassessment –Notice-Additional grounds-Legal grounds admitted-Recorded reasons under wrong premises-Reassessment proceedings void ab initio-Sanction-Approval granted mechanically-Notice and all consequent proceedings liable to be quashed.[S.147, 151]
Ashok Kumar Agarwal v. ITO (2023)102 ITR 74 (SN)(Delhi) (Trib)
S. 148: Reassessment-Notice-Fishing enquiry-Recorded reasons are identical with information received-Foundation of reasons not existing when reasons recorded-Recorded reasons invalid-Assessments are quashed. [S. 147]
Bikash Dev v. Dy. CIT (2023)102 ITR 701 (Cuttack) (Trib)