This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws
S. 149: Reassessment-Time limit for notice-Notice issued beyond six years after the end of the relevant assessment year-Notice issued without withdrawing the first notice dated 31-3-2021-Order is bad in law.[S. 148, 148A, Art. 226]
Stalco Consultancy & Systems (P.) Ltd. v. PCIT (2023) (2023) 455 ITR 308/ 291 Taxman 390 /333 CTR 205 (Orissa)(HC)
S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Income deemed to accrue or arise in India-Royalty-Fees for technical services-Tax residency certificate-Reply filed by the assessee was had not been properly considered-Orders set aside-DTAA-India-Singapore-USA [S.9(1)(vi), 9(1)(vii),148A(b), 148A(d), Art. 12, Art, 226]
Boeing Company v. UOI (2023) 291 Taxman 406 (Delhi)(HC)
S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Assessing Officer issued on assessee notices under section 148 dated 8-4-2021 seeking to reopen assessment for assessment years 2015-16 and 2016-17-Mandatory procedure of a prior inquiry under section 148A had not been followed-notices were unsustainable in law and quashed-Sanction-Sanction of Additional Commissioner and not only from Principal Chief Commissioner-Notice was quashed. [S. 148, 151, Art. 226]
Sylvesa Infotech (P.) Ltd. v. Addl. CIT (2023) 457 ITR 433/ 291 Taxman 375/ 332 CTR 803/ 226 DTR 13 (Orissa) (HC)
S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Entry operator-Monetary limit of less than 50 lakhs-Subsequent information-Writ petition was dismissed.[S. 148, 148A(b), 148A(d), Art. 226]
Ester Industries Ltd. v. ACIT (2023) 291 Taxman 172 (Delhi)(HC).Editorial : SLP dismissed as withdrawn , Ester Industries Ltd. v. ACIT (2023) 292 Taxman 1 (SC )
S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Accommodation entries-No reply was filed-Disputed facts-Writ petition was dismissed.[S.133(6) 148A(b), Art. 226]
North End Foods Marketing (P.) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2023) 291 Taxman 482 (Delhi)(HC)
S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Notice issued after more than six years-non-compliance with mandatory requirements-Period had not got extended by Taxation and Other Laws (Relaxation and Amendment of Certain Provisions) Act, 2020-Notices dated 1-4-2021 and 5-4-2021 were held to be bad in law. [S. 148, 149, Art. 226]
Stalco Consultancy & Systems (P.) Ltd. v. PCIT (2023) 455 ITR 308/ 291 Taxman 390 333 CTR 205 (Orissa) (HC)
S. 148A : Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Not granting the time prescribed from 7 to 30 days-Oder was set aside. [S. 148A(b), Art. 226]
Vesser Engineering Services (P.) Ltd. v. UOI (2022) 291 Taxman 179 (Chhattisgarh)(HC)
S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Accommodating entries-Investigation revealed that the transaction was merely accommodating entries-Reopening of assessment is held to be valid. [S. 148A(d), Art. 226]
Mahalaxmi Dye India (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT (2023) 291 Taxman 473 (Delhi)(HC)
S. 148A : Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Amalgamation-Notice issued in the name of a company which was amalgamated with Assessee (amalgamated company) and was not in existence on date of issue of such notice-The notice and consequent order is held to be invalid. [S. 148, 148A(d), Art. 226]
Sumant Investments (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT (2023) 291 Taxman 227 (Delhi)(HC)
S. 148 : Reassessment-Notice-Second notice-After High Court remanded the matter.-Second notice is bad in law. [S. 153(6)(i), Art. 226]
Elite Pharmaceuticals v. ITO [2023] 291 Taxman 597 (Cal)(HC)