This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S. 251 : Appeal-Commissioner (Appeals)-Powers-Delay of 1694 days-Appeal is dismissed-CIT(A) cannot dismiss the appeal for default expressly or by inevitable implication; appellate authority has to decide the appeal on merits-Matter remanded to the file of CIT(A) to decide on merits.[S. 250]

Medavakkam Vattara Nadargalikkiya Sangam v. ITO (2024) 232 TTJ 76 (UO)/ 38 NYPTTJ 1359 (Chennai)(Trib)

S. 251 : Appeal-Commissioner (Appeals)-Powers-Setting aside of matter back to the AO-Failure to file return-Best judgement assessment-No power to set aside the matter w.e.f 1st June 2001-the matter is restored back to the CIT(A) with a direction to call for a remand report from the AO and then adjudicate the matter. [S. 139, 142(1), 144]

Jyoti Prakash Deshmukh v. ITO (2024) 232 TTJ 314 / 244 DTR 1 / 38 NYPTTJ 1270 (Mum)(Trib)

S. 250 : Appeal-Commissioner (Appeals)-Procedure-Intimation-Rectification-No power to give direction or finding in respect of issues which are not subject before him. [S.143(1), 154, 249]

Church Educational Society v. ACIT (2024) 232 TTJ 553 / 244 DTR 193 / 38 NYPTTJ 1419 (Hyd)(Trib) Aurora Educational Society v. ACIT (2024) 232 TTJ 553 / 244 DTR 193 / 38 NYPTTJ 1419 (Hyd)(Trib) Karshak Vidya Parisad v. ACIT (2024) 232 TTJ 553 / 244 DTR 193 / 38 NYPTTJ 1419 (Hyd)(Trib)

S. 249 : Appeal-Commissioner (Appeals)-Form of appeal and limitation-Appeal filed before wrong forum-Delay of 657 days in filing an appeal-Form No 35 was filed before the AO instead of CIT(A)-Delay is condoned-Assessee is directed to deposit Rs. 5,000 to Prime Minister National Relief Fund within thirty days-CIT(A) is directed to decide the appeal on merits. [S. 249(3),250,253(3), 254(1)]

Krishna Gopal Raneja v. ITO (2024) 232 TTJ 1 ((UO) (Jodhpur) (Trib)

S. 153A: Assessment-Search-Dumb document-Quotations-Loose papers-Addition is deleted. [S.69C]

Raj Technology v. Dy.CIT (2024) 232 TTJ 945 / 38 NYPTTJ 1350 (Mum)(Trib)

S. 153A: Assessment-Search-Information from Investigation wing-Foreign Bank-The assessee has accepted the relevant documents as genuine-Not necessary to follow the procedure laid down in S. 65B of Indian Evidence Act, 1872-Admissible as evidence-Deposits in HSBC London-Income from other sources-Art. 23(3) of Indo-UK DTAA is not automatically applicable-DTAA-India-UK-Bank account showed closed status-Notional interest income cannot be estimated. [S. 90, Indian Evidence Act, 1872, S.65B, Art. 23(3)]

Rajinder Kumar v. ACIT (2024) 232 TTJ 261 / 243 DTR 297 / 38 NYPTTJ 776 (Delhi)(Trib)

S. 151 : Reassessment-Sanction for issue of notice-Notice was issued before the expiry of four years from the end of the relevant assessment year-It should have been issued after obtaining the satisfaction of Jt. CIT-The approval obtained from the Principal CIT is not valid. [S. 147, 148, 151(ii)]

Kavita Raneja v. ITO (2024) 232 TTJ 129 (UO) (Jodhpur) (Trib)

S. 147: Reassessment-Incorrect information-Reassessment is not valid-Receipt on sale of goods-Addition is deleted. [S. 68, 148]

Vinayak Traders v. ITO (2024) 232 TTJ 958 / 38 NYPTTJ 1205 (Jodhpur)(Trib)

S. 147: Reassessment-Cash deposits-No addition was made in respect of reasons recorded-Issue which is not subject of recorded reason-Addition cannot be made-Additional ground is admitted.[S. 148, 254(1)]

Subhash Runwal v. ITO (2024) 232 TTJ 99/ 243 DTR 177 / 38 NYPTTJ 1252 (SMC) (Pune)(Trib)

S. 147 : Reassessment-Survey-Information from Investigation Wing-Re assessment is valid-Expenses through international credit cards-Addition is sustained.[S.69C, 133A, 148]

Lalit Kumar Modi v. Dy.CIT (2024) 232 TTJ 430 / 243 DTR 385 / 38 NYPTTJ 1400 (Delhi)(Trib