S. 9(1)(vi) : Income deemed to accrue or arise in India-Royalty-Fees for included services- Reviewing risk factor in particular project- Cannot be deemed to accrue or arise in India- DTAA-India-USA.[S.9(1)(vii), art.12]
CIT (I). v ABB INC. [2023] 152 taxmann.com 101/(2024)461 ITR 297 (Karn)(HC)
Digest of case laws
Online digest of latest case laws
This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws S. 9(1)(vi) : Income deemed to accrue or arise in India-Royalty-Computer software- Sale of conditional access systems and middleware products to Indian customers- Not taxable as royalty-SLP dismissed-DTAA-India-Switzerland.[art 12(3)]
CIT (IT) v. Nagravision S. A. (2024)461 ITR 146/ 297 Taxman 65 (SC) Editorial : CIT (IT) v. Nagravision S. A. (2023) 157 taxmann.com 457/ (2024) 461 ITR 143 (Delhi)(HC).S. 4 : Charge of income-tax-Sales tax incentive-Capital receipt-Not chargeable to tax. [S. 260A]
PCIT v. Shantinath Detergents (P.) Ltd [2023] 151 taxmann.com 68 / [2024] 461 ITR 302 (Cal)(HC)Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988 , Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Amendment Act, 2016 .
S. 2(9) : Benami Transactions- Provisional attachment order – Alternative remedy – Writ petition is dismissed .[ S.24(1), 24(3) , Art. 226 ]
Santosh Bhadoriya v. UOI (2024) 298 Taxman 602 (MP)(HC)Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act , 2020.
S. 4 : Filing of declaration -Delay in filing of appeal – Rejection of application by Designated Authority is affirmed .[ IT Act , 271AAB , Art. 226 ]
Umesh Garg v. UOI (2024) 297 Taxman 91 (All.)(HC)Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020 Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020
S. 3: Declaration- Rejection of declaration — Erroneous determination of tax — Part payment made is not considered – Disabled to file revised Form 3 due to technical glitches on Website – Marginal delay in filing Form 4 attributable to respondents — Department is directed to accept declaration subject to making of payments of tax. [ S. 3, 5(1),5(2) , Art. 226 ]
Neelam Ajit Phatarpekar (Mrs.) v. Asst. CIT (2024)462 ITR 467 /336 CTR 749 (Bom)( HC)S. 80IB(10) : Housing projects- Area off residential units should not exceed specified limit — Entitled to deduction — SLP of Revenue is dismissed .[ Art. 136 ]
PCIT v. Vardhan Builders (2023) 256 taxmann.com. 364 / (2024)462 ITR 454 (SC) Editorial : PCIT v. Vardhan Builders (2022) 291 Taxman 450 / (2023) 456 ITR 310 ( Bom)(HC)S. 276C : Offences and prosecutions-Wilful attempt to evade tax-
Penalty deleted-No concealment of income-Prosecution could not continue.[S. 277]
S. 264 :Commissioner-Revision of other orders-Claim to deduction under Section 80IA not made in return of income and assessment order passed-Principal Commissioner or Commissioner Competent to consider claim for deduction-Matter Remanded. [S. 80IA, 139, 263, Art.226]
Tata-Aldesa Jv v. UOI (2024)460 ITR 302/159 taxmann.com 534 (Telangana)(HC)S. 226 : Collection and recovery-Modes of recovery-Stay of recovery proceedings-Pendency of appeal before CIT(A)-Directed to deposit Rs 10 lakhs. [Art. 226]
Ramasamy Rajkumar v. PCIT [2023] 155 taxmann.com 579 / (2024)460 ITR 669 (Mad)(HC)