S. 147 : Reassessment-Not made any addition pertaining to three-folded reasons for reopening the assessment-Cash credits-Reassessment order is bad in law.[S. 68, 148, 254(1)]
ITO v. Hassab Realty Pvt. Ltd. (2022) 99 ITR 315 (Pune) (Trib)S. 147 : Reassessment-Not made any addition pertaining to three-folded reasons for reopening the assessment-Cash credits-Reassessment order is bad in law.[S. 68, 148, 254(1)]
ITO v. Hassab Realty Pvt. Ltd. (2022) 99 ITR 315 (Pune) (Trib)S. 147 : Reassessment-Best Judgment Assessment-Natural justice-Notice issued u/s 143(2)-Assessee was out of station-Not attended-Order was passed under section 144-Matter remanded for re-adjudication. [S.50C, 143(2),144, 148]
Gopi Kishan Pandey v.ITO (2022) 99 ITR 203 (Trib) (Lucknow)(Trib)S. 147 : Reassessment-With in four years-Subsequent decision of High Court-Reassessment is valid [S. 148]
Dy. CIT v. Clarion Technologies (P) Ltd. (2022) 216 TTJ 23 (UO) (Pune)(Trib)S. 147 : Reassessment-With in four years-Assessment year 2005-06 was the initial assessment year-Substantial expansion-No suppression of material-Reassessment is held to be bad in law [S. 80IC, 143(3), 148]
Valco Industries Ltd. v. ACIT (2022) 215 DTR 181 /218 TTJ 628 (Chd)(Trib)S. 147 : Reassessment-Setting aside Tribunal’s order by high court revives appeal from date of inception-Jurisdiction open to question as matter not final. [S. 144C]
YCH Logistics (India) Pvt. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2022) 98 ITR 467 (Chennai) (Trib)S. 147 : Reassessment-Information relating to cash deposit and purchase of property-Addition was made on account of expenditure-Reasons for initiation of reassessment proceedings ceased to survive-Reassessment is bad in law.[S. 37(1), 148]
Manish Mittal v. ITO (2022) 98 ITR 18 (SN)(Delhi) (Trib)S. 147 : Reassessment-No addition was made on grounds on which notice is issued-Other additions do not survive-Reassessment was quashed. [S. 92C, 133A, 148]
Edelweiss Rural and Corporate Services Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT (2022) 98 ITR 69 (SN) (Mum)(Trib)S. 147 : Reassessment-Notice-Additions made on the ground different from reassessment grounds-Reassessment not sustainable. [S.148]
Jeet Singh v. ITO (2022) 98 ITR 331 (Delhi) (Trib)S. 147 : Reassessment-Additions made for issues different from ground of reassessment-Additions not sustainable. [S. 148]
Pushpa Singh v. PCIT (2022)98 ITR 79 /(2023) 224 TTJ 20(Pat) (Trib)S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Cash credits-No failure to disclose material facts-Reassessment is invalid. [S. 68, 148]
Dy. CIT v. Pacharia Exports Pvt. Ltd. (2022)95 ITR 13 (Kol) (Trib)