S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Technical service fee-Relief granted for AY. 2004-05 was not challenged-Addition was deleted. [S. 92CA]
SS Oral Hygine Products (P) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2022) 220 TTJ 939 / 145 taxmann.com 285 (Mum)(Trib)S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Technical service fee-Relief granted for AY. 2004-05 was not challenged-Addition was deleted. [S. 92CA]
SS Oral Hygine Products (P) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2022) 220 TTJ 939 / 145 taxmann.com 285 (Mum)(Trib)S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Aggregation of transaction-justified in segregating international transaction of professional charges to be processed independent of other international transactions-Allowability of expenditure-Matter remanded. [S. 92CA]
Faurecia Automotive Seating India (P) Ltd. v. ACIT (2022) 220 TTJ 177 / 217 DTR 375 / 141 taxmann.com 126 /( 2023)103 ITR 580 (Pune)(Trib)S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Interest on receivables-Reduction of credit period to 30 days from 90 days by Dispute Resolution Panel-Service agreement with associated enterprise amended to 90 days-TPO to consider 90 days-Matter Remanded. [S. 92B (1)]
Outsourcepartners International Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT (2022)97 ITR 22 (SN) (Bang) (Trib)S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Corporate Guarantee Computation of commission at 0.5 percent-Justified [S. 92B]
Dy. CIT v. S. Kumars Nationwide Ltd. (2022) 97 ITR 60 (S.N.) (Mum) (Trib)S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Guarantee commission-Yield spread approach-Adjustments made by the TPO was deleted.[S. 92CA]
Dy. CIT v. Sikka Ports & Terminals Ltd. (2022) 219 TTJ 159 / 219 DTR 75 / 140 taxmann.com 211 (Mum)(Trib)S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-AMP expenses-Adjustments-Not justified-Purchase-Imports-Gross margins of assessee were much more than gross margins of comparable companies chosen by TPO, no adjustment to ALP was to be made in respect of import of finished goods. [S. 92CA]
Kellogg India (P) Ltd. v. ACIT (2022) 218 TTJ 914 / 139 taxmann.com 205 (Mum)(Trib)S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Comparables, functional similarity-Least complex entity to a transaction should be adopted as a tested party-Composite set of books of account-Aggregation of transactions-Transfer pricing adjustment should be restricted only to international transactions. [S.92CA]
Lear Automotive India (P) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2021) 133 taxmann.com 502 / (2022) 217 TTJ 440 (Pune)(Trib)S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Methods for determination of-Resale price method-International transaction is not that of purchase by an Indian entity, then RPM cannot be applied-Brand building expenses-Employees cost and operating and administrative expenses incurred for year in question and claimed as deduction in entirety in year alone could not be treated as Brand building expenses. [R. 10B(1)(b)]
Save Medica Ltd. v. ACIT (2022) 217 TTJ 81 / 133 taxmann.com 503 (Pune)(Trib)S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Comparable-Functionally not comparable-Excluded from the list of comparbles. [S.92CA]
Weatherford Drilling and Production Services (India) Pvt. Ltd. v ACIT (2022)100 ITR 46 (SN)(Ahd) (Trib)S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Transfer Pricing Officer was directed to compute profit level indicator of assessee at. 11.35 Per Cent-Selection of comparable-Functionally comparable to be included as comaparble. [S. 92CA]
Tricom Infotech Solutions Ltd. v.Dy. CIT (2022)100 ITR 41 (SN)(Mum) (Trib)