This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S. 147 : After the expiry of four years-Investment in Mutual funds-Did not file the income tax return-Did not respond to various notices-Neither conduct nor alleged prejudice suffered by assessee prompt Court to exercise any discretion to receive matter and adjudicate same without leaving assessee free to approach regular statutory remedy in accordance with law-Writ petition is dismissed. [S. 10(26),10(45), 139(1), 139(4C), 142(1), 148, Art. 226, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order VII Rule 11,]

Ramona Massar v. UOI (2023) 294 Taxman 89 /334 CTR 880 (Meghalaya)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Order passed without disposing off objection raised by passing a speaking order-Assessment order and notice is set aside. [S. 143(3), 148, Art. 226]

Hewlett Packard Financial Services (India) v. DCIT (2023) 294 taxman 25 (Karn)(HC)

Interpretation of Taxing Statutes — Ejusdem Generis — Noscitur A Sociis.

D. N. Singh v .CIT (2023)454 ITR 595/ 293 Taxman 550/ 332 CTR 665 / 226 DTR 17 (SC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Unexplained expenditure-Search-No failure to disclose material facts-[S. 132, 143(3), 148]

PCIT v. DSC Ltd. (2023) 294 Taxman 720 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Unexplained investments-Sale of land-Depreciable assets-Information from investigation wing-Sale consideration n was disclosed in the return-Reassessment notice and order disposing the objection was quashed. [S. 48, 50C, 69A, 143(1), 148, Art.226]

Apex Remedies (P.) Ltd. v. ITO (2023) 294 Taxman 215 /(2024) 462 ITR 114(Guj.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Cash credits-Search-Deposit of cash in bank-No scrutiny assessment was done-Reassessment notice is held to be justified.[S. 68, 143(1), 147, Art. 226]

Ramakant v. ITO (2023) 294 Taxman 48 / 333 CTR 791(Delhi)(HC)/Editorial : Review petition is dismissed , Ramakant v. ITO (2023) ( 2023) 333 CTR 786 ( Delhi)( HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-No failure to disclose true and full material-Question was raised and reply was filed-Reassessment notice and order disposing the objection was quashed. [S. 14A, 142(1), 143(3), 148, Art. 226]

Sandesh Procon (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT (2023) 459 ITR 453 / 294 Taxman 52 (Guj.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Amalgamation-Carry forward and set off of accumulated loss and unabsorbed depreciation-No failure to disclose any material fact-Change of opinion-Reassessment notice and order disposing the objection was quashed. [S. 72A(2), 72(3), 148, Art. 226]

Hindoostan Mills Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2023) 294 Taxman 362 (Bom.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Infrastructure development-Change of opinion-Pendency of appeal before CIT(A)-No failure to disclose material facts-Reassessment notice and order disposing the objection was quashed.[S. 80IA, 148,246A, Art. 226]

Nuclear Power Corporation of India Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2023) 294 Taxman 365 (Bom.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Share capital-Share premium-No failure to disclose material facts-Reasons not specifying material facts which are not disclosed-Notice and order disposing the objection was quashed and set aside. [S. 68, 132, 147, Art. 226]

Rajshree Realtors (P.) Ltd. v. UOI (2023) 457 ITR 354 / 294 Taxman 228 / 334 CTR 866 (Bom.)(HC)