S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Entertainment expenses Disallowance was restricted to 10%-Held to be proper-Transfer pricing adjustment deleted by the CIT(A) was affirmed [S. 92C]
Dy. CIT v. Manaksia Steels Ltd. (2022)99 ITR 12 (SN)(Kol) (Trib)S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Entertainment expenses Disallowance was restricted to 10%-Held to be proper-Transfer pricing adjustment deleted by the CIT(A) was affirmed [S. 92C]
Dy. CIT v. Manaksia Steels Ltd. (2022)99 ITR 12 (SN)(Kol) (Trib)S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Finance lease-Reclassified and claimed as deduction-Absence of details not allowed as deduction.
Capgemini Technology Services India Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2022) 220 TTJ 409 (Pune) (Trib)S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Taxes paid abroad-Taxes for which no benefit of foreign tax credit has been allowed-Allowable as deduction. [S. 40(a)(ii), 90, 91]
Capgemini Technology Services India Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2022) 220 TTJ 409 (Pune) (Trib)S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Medical check-up provision for charges payable to hospitals-Matter remanded for verification-Escrow Disbursement Provision for incentive payable to distributors-The deduction for the incentive commission is to be allowed the package was sold as reduced by the payments made in respect of the on actual payment basis in the concerned year irrespective of the year in which packages sold in the earlier years. [S. 145]
ACIT v. Indus Health Plus (P) Ltd. (2022) 220 TTJ 764 (Pune)(Trib)S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Capital or revenue-Documents and stamp charges on conversion of debentures into equity shares-Capital expenditure-Alternative claim under section 35D is also rejected. [S. 35D]
Sacmi Engineering India (P) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2022) 215 TTJ 1029 (Ahd)(Trib)S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Excess interest charged by Bank-Not allowable as deduction-Disallowance was restricted to the extent of the amount claimed as deduction during the year.-Corporate guarantee commission allowable as deduction.
Maharashtra State Road Development Corporation Ltd v. Add.CIT (2022) 218 TTJ 12(UO) (Mum)(Trib)S. 37(1): Business expenditure-Provision for expenses on periodic overlay of BOT road-Ascertained liability-Any addition made towards such provision would enhance the taxable profit which is eligible for deduction under S 80IA(4)(i)-A revenue neutral exercise-Allowable as deduction.[S.80IA(4)(i)]
Dy. CIT v. GVK Jaipur Expressway (P) Ltd. (2022) 216 TTJ 540 (Jaipur)(Trib)S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Provision for warranty expenses-Matter remanded. [S. 145]
MRF Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2022) 98 ITR 80 (SN)(Chennai) (Trib)S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Capital or revenue-Legal expenses-Allowable as revenue expenditure. [S. 269UC]
Mangalam Arts v. Dy. CIT (2022) 98 ITR 63 (SN)(Jaipur) (Trib)S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Legal and travelling expenses-Defence of Directors and Shareholders who were accused in case before CBI Special Court-Matter remanded.
Kalaignar TV Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT (2022) 98 ITR 7 (SN)/)/( 2023) 198 ITD 22 (Chennai) (Trib.)