S. 69A: Unexplained money – Cash found in the work premises – Sales – Matter restored to AO to consider the evidence submitted. [ S. 131, 133A]
Turab Ali Bohra v. ACIT( 2025) 121 ITR 153 ( Jaipur )( Trib)S. 69A: Unexplained money – Cash found in the work premises – Sales – Matter restored to AO to consider the evidence submitted. [ S. 131, 133A]
Turab Ali Bohra v. ACIT( 2025) 121 ITR 153 ( Jaipur )( Trib)S. 69A: Unexplained money- Cash deposit – Demonetisation- Cash sales – Deletion of addition is affirmed by the Tribunal . [S. 68 ]
Subhash Chand Gupta v. ACIT (2025) 210 ITD 118 (Delhi) (Trib.)S. 68: Cash credits -Share application- Share premium- Identity and creditworthiness and genuineness is established – Addition is deleted.
Shankar Traders & Distributors (P.) Ltd. v. ITO (2025) 210 ITD 41 (Kol.) (Trib.)S. 68: Cash credits – Share capital – Share premium- Proved the identity, credit worthiness and genuineness by documents –Addition is deleted. [ S. 133(6) ]
One Point Commercial Pvt. Ltd v. ITO( 2025) 121 ITR 526 (Kol)( Trib)S. 68:Cash credits – Identity and creditworthiness is established -b The loan was repaid through banking channels- Addition is deleted . [ S. 147, 148 ]
Rajuram Savaji Purohit v. ITO [2025] 210 ITD 358 (Mum)(Trib.)S. 68: Cash credits -Unsecured loan- The assessee satisfactorily explained the source of the loan, and the lender’s credibility was established through the repayment in cheque and the lender’s business activity. The addition is deleted . [ S.133(6) ]
Prarthana Gems v. Dy. CIT [2025] 210 ITD 158 (Surat)(Trib.)S. 68: Cash credits – Deposit in bank – The deposits are backed by equivalent withdrawals or immediate transfers, the entire deposit amount should not be treated as unexplained income- Net profit rate of 1 per cent on entire deposit is confirmed . [ S. 148 ]
Pankaj Pyarelal Khemka v. ITO [2025] 210 ITD 585 (Mum)(Trib.)S. 68 : Cash credits – Agriculturist – Bank deposits -Non-filing of ITR – additions on account of unexplained cash deposited in savings bank account & income from LTCG on the sale of agricultural land- ex-parte assessment order – Assessee was required to substantiate his income before the AO with proper and supporting evidence – matter remanded.[ S. 2(14), 45 ]
Dnyaneshwar Baburao Kathe v. ITO (2025) 210 ITD 85 (Pune) (Trib.)S. 68 : Cash credits – Demonetisation – Specified Bank notes – Sales – Matter remanded to the Assessing Officer .[ S. 115BBE ]
B. K. Rajanna v. ITO (2025) 210 ITD 677 (Bang.) (Trib.)S. 68: Cash credits – Share capital – Share premium – Assessee had demonstrated that subscribing companies were having adequate reserves and surpluses to invest- Addition is deleted .
.