This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws
S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Capital or Revenue expenditure-Consumables revenue expenditure allowable in the year in which put in line of production-Allowance in previous years not erroneous-Assessing Officer taking sustainable view after enquiry-Revision is not warranted. [S. 32, 37(1)]
SI Group India P. Ltd. v. ACIT (LTU) (2023)101 ITR 70 (SN)(Mum) (Trib)
S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Possible view taken by Assessing Officer after pursuing all the evidences-In line with view taken by Tribunal-Revision not warranted. [S. 54]
Prerak Goel v. P CIT (2023) 101 ITR 30 (SN.)(Mum) (Trib)
S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Order of Tribunal-Weightage to Tribunal order not given-Against fundamental Principles of judicial discipline-Revision is not sustainable.[S. 2(22)(e), 254(1)]
Parag Prakash Doshi v. PCIT (2023)101 ITR 42 (SN)(Ahd) (Trib)
S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Assessing Officer calling for details of advertisement and sales promotion during assessment-Possible view taken after going through evidences-Order of Assessing Officer is not erroneous-PCIT is not justified-Revision is not warranted.[S. 37(1)]
Mylan Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd. v. ITO (2023)101 ITR 26 (SN) (Hyd) (Trib)
S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Failure to verify wages expenditure-Failure to deduct tax at on payments-Casual labour accepted without verification-Assessing Officer accepted certificates filed by assessee without recording reasons-Revision is justified. [S. 37(1), 40 (a) (ia)]
M. K. S. Engineering Co. Pvt. Ltd. v. PCIT (2023)199 ITD 779/ 101 ITR 65 (SN)/ 222 TTJ 646 (Jabalpur) (Trib)
S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Failure of Assessing Officer to inquire loss on disposal of assets/expenditure-Assessing Officer duty bound to disallow expenditure which is not of revenue expenditure in P & L account-Revision is justified.[S. 37(1)]
Bombay Transport Co-Operative Consumer Society Ltd. v. ITO (2023)101 ITR 72 (SN) (Mum) (Trib)
S. 263: Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Assessing officer made enquiries-Contention of the PCIT that examination not done incorrect-Contention that A.O. had only one day to pass order invalid-Revision not Justified.[S. 143(2)]
ADM Agro Industries Kota And Akola Pvt. Ltd. v. PCIT (2023)101 ITR 93 (SN) (Delhi) (Trib)
S. 254(2): Appellate Tribunal-Rectification of mistake apparent from the record-Tribunal adjudicated appeal on merits-Failure to adjudicate legal ground-Mistake apparent from record-Miscellaneous application filed by Assessee allowed
Amar Singh Saharan v. ITO (2023)103 ITR 388 (Jodhpur)(Trib)
S. 254(2): Appellate Tribunal-Rectification of mistake apparent from the record-Recall of order-Speaking order of Tribunal-Recall of observations-Beyond jurisdiction of Tribunal.
ACIT v. Anthony F. R. Madassar (2023)103 ITR 175 (Amritsar)(Trib)
S. 254(1) : Appellate Tribunal-Powers-New ground-Validity of reassessment-Not challenged before lower authorities-Cannot be raised [S. 147, 148,ITATR,1963,R. 27]
ACIT v. Ravi Sellappan (2023)104 ITR 289 / 221 TTJ 681 (Pune)(Trib)