This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S. 254(1) : Appellate Tribunal-Powers-Limitation-Condonation of delay-Assessee’s CA expired-Assesssee made aware only upon intimation of penalty order-Assessee, a cardiac patient undergone treatment-Sufficient cause-Delay condoned. [S. 253]

Vijay Liladhar Mohmaya v. ITO (2023)101 ITR 33 (SN) (Mum) (Trib)

S. 253 : Appellate Tribunal-Appeals-Legacy Dispute Resolution-Assessee opting to settle dispute under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme and obtaining Form 4 from Department-Withdrawal of appeal allowed-If dispute unresolved assessee shall be at liberty to approach Tribunal for reinstitution of appeal .[S. 254(1) Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020]

AD Mega Structure India P. Ltd. v. ITO (2023)103 ITR 260 Delhi) (Trib)

S. 253 : Appellate Tribunal-Appeal by assessee-Assessee not putting appearance-Not adducing material before Tribunal to controvert findings-Order of CIT (A) justified.[S. 250]

MGS Securities P. Ltd. v.Dy. CIT (2023)101 ITR 95 (SN)(Delhi) (Trib)

S. 253 : Appellate Tribunal-Monetary limit-50 lakhs monetary limit for appeal by Department-Circular laying down limit applicable to retrospectively even to pending appeals. [CBDT Circular No. 17 Of 2019, Dated August 8, 2019] [S. 268A]

Saranya Agro Foods Pvt. Ltd. v. ITO (2023)101 ITR 60 (SN)(Chennai) (Trib)

S. 251 : Appeal-Commissioner (Appeals)-Powers-Dismissal of appeal for non appearance-Tribunal restored the matter to the file of the CIT (A) to decide afresh in the interest of natural justice.[S. 55A, 55C,254(1)]

Arun Moreshwar Patil v. ITO (2023)104 ITR 53 (SN) (Mum) (Trib)

S. 251 : Appeal-Commissioner (Appeals)-Powers-Claim of deduction under Section 54F-Commissioner (Appeals) directing Assessing Officer to verify and allow claim-Not tantamount to setting aside or remanding matter to Assessing Officer-No Violation of Section 251(1)(a)-Order of Commissioner (Appeals) upheld.[S. 251(1)(a)]

Asst. CIT v. Justice N. Kannadasan (2023)103 ITR 590 (Chennai) (Trib)

S. 250 : Appeal-Commissioner (Appeals)-Procedure-Ex parte order passed before commissioner (Appeals) due to miscommunication-bona fide reason of assessee for miscommunication-matter restored to AO and providing opportunity for hearing. [S. 250(6)] b

Kishoresinh Hemantsinh Chudasama v. Dy. CIT (2023)103 ITR 391 (Ahd) (Trib)

S. 250 : Appeal-Commissioner (Appeals)-Procedure-Exparte order-In case of failure of assessee to reply to any notices, the CIT(A) is dutybound to adjudicate on available data instead of dismissal of appeal.[S. 250(6)]

Dura Line India Private Ltd. v. ACIT (Delhi)(Trib)

S. 250 : Appeal-Commissioner (Appeals)-Procedure-CIT(A) cannot go beyond the assessment year other than the one under consideration-Direction to A.O. to take remedial action for other Assessment year not sustainable.[S. 246A, 251]

Wieden+Kennedy India Pvt. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2023)101 ITR 63 (SN) (Delhi) (Trib)

S. 250: Appeal-Commissioner (Appeals)-Procedure-Appeal arising from penalty order-Appeal to Appellate Tribunal-To be decided after finalization of Quantum Proceeding.[S. 253,254]

Babita Devi Kajoria v ITO (2023)101 ITR 17 (SN)(Kol) (Trib)