This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws
S. 250 : Appeal-Commissioner (Appeals)-Procedure-CIT(A) cannot go beyond the assessment year other than the one under consideration-Direction to A.O. to take remedial action for other Assessment year not sustainable.[S. 246A, 251]
Wieden+Kennedy India Pvt. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2023)101 ITR 63 (SN) (Delhi) (Trib)
S. 250: Appeal-Commissioner (Appeals)-Procedure-Appeal arising from penalty order-Appeal to Appellate Tribunal-To be decided after finalization of Quantum Proceeding.[S. 253,254]
Babita Devi Kajoria v ITO (2023)101 ITR 17 (SN)(Kol) (Trib)
S. 250 : Appeal-Commissioner (Appeals)-Procedure-Delay of 9 years in filing appeal-Order sent to E-mail ID of accountant who had left job-Assessee came to know when refund of AY 2019-20 was proposed to be adjusted against demand of AY 2010-11-Assessee filed affidavit. Sufficient cause for not filing appeal within time. Matter remanded back to CIT(A) to pass order on merits, denovo. [S.80IB ,245, 251, Limitation Act ,1963 S.5]
M.K. Hotels & Resorts Ltd. v. ACIT (2023)104 ITR 204 (Amritsar) (Trib)
S. 248: Appeal-Commissioner (Appeals)-Denying liability to deduct tax-Appeal is maintainable .[S. 90, 115A, 195, 206AA)
Reliance Commercial Dealers Ltd. v. CIT (2023) 202 ITD 490/ 105 ITR 57 (SN) (Mum)(Trib)
S. 246A : Appeal-Commissioner (Appeals)-Appealable orders-Deduction of tax at source-Credit-Intimation denying credit for tax at source-Appealable .[S. 143(1)]
D and C Phoenix v .Asst. DIT (2023)104 ITR 55 (SN)(Ahd) (Trib)
S. 244A : Refunds-Interest on refunds-Interest on Income Tax Refund to be calculated till the Grant of Refund and not till the date of order .[S. 143(3), 243]
Girnar Software Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT (Jaipur)(Trib)
S.234E: Fee-Default in furnishing the statements-Not leviable for TDS deducted prior to 1 June 2015-NFAC is bound by the binding decision of the jurisdictional High Court .[S. 200A]
Nagesh Consultants v. Dy.CIT(2023) 103 ITR 24 (SN) (Bang) (Trib)
S. 234E : Fee-Default in furnishing the statements-Tax deducted at source deposited within the time limits prescribed, under the Act-Interest cannot be levied merely for delay in the filing of tax deducted at source return. [S.195,Form No 27Q.]
Kanta Govind Singh v. ACIT (Ahd)(Trib) (UR)
S.234E: Fee-Default in furnishing the statements-Applicable only prospectively i.e. from 01.06.2015.[S.200A]
Anumod Viswambharan v. ITO (TDS) (2023) 201 ITD 743 (Cochin) (Trib.)