This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws
S. 194C: Deduction at source-Contractors-Technical services-Processing of milk attracts deduction of tax at source under section 194C at 2 per cent is rightly deducted-Order of Tribunal is affirmed.[S. 40(a)(ia), 194J, 260A]
PCIT v. Maahi Milk Producer Co. Ltd. (2024) 460 ITR 222 (Guj) HC)
S. 179 : Private company-Liability of directors-Order against Ex-director of company-No steps were taken to recover dues from the company-Order is set aside. [Art. 226]
Bhailal Babubhai Patel v. PCIT (2024) 460 ITR 226 (Guj (HC)
S. 176 : Discontinued Business—Company struck off from official register of companies-Reassessment-Directors-Reassessment proceedings against the Directors in case of struck companies. S. 176 is applicable only when the company has discontinued the business. [S. 147, 148, 176(5), 176(7), Companies Act Art. 226]
Pandian Anbalagan v. ITO (Mad.)(2024) 296 Taxman 499 (Mad)(HC)
S. 154 : Rectification of mistake-Mistake apparent from the record-Inadvertently disclosed income in its return-Return was accepted u/s. 139(1)-Rectification is rejected-Tribunal allowing the claim-Dismissing the appeal the Court held that merely because respondent included the income in the return as taxable cannot make it amenable to imposition of tax-DTAA-India-USA [. S. 139(1),143(1), 260A, Art. 14]
CIT (IT) v. Heidrick and Struggles Inc. (2024) 461ITR 33 (Delhi)(HC) Editorial : Followed CBDT Circular 14 of 1995 dated 11.04.1995. Referred CIT v. Bharat General Reinsurance Co. Ltd. (1971)81 ITR 303 (Delhi)(HC)
S. 148A : Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Limitation-Notice issued after three years-Barred by limitation-Travel back in time theory unsustainable-That the principle of constructive res judicata was not applicable. The orders passed under section 148A(d) and the consequent notices issued for the assessment years 2016-17 and 2017-18 under the amended provisions of section 148 of the 1961 Act were unsustainable. [S. 148, 148A(b) 148A(d),149, Art. 142, 226]
Ganesh Dass Khanna v. ITO (2023) 156 taxmann.com417/ 335 CTR 881 / (2024) 460 ITR 546 (Delhi)(HC)
S. 148A : Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Resident of Uganda-Mutual fund investment-Source of investments coming from Non-Resident External Accounts Beyond Reach Of Authorities-No Tangible material for belief that income had escaped assessment-Notice not valid.[S.10(4), 148, 148A(b), 148A(d), Art. 226]
Nitin Mavji Vekaria v. ITO (2024) 461ITR 18 (Guj)(HC)
S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-No violation of principle of natural justice-Loan transactions-Question of fact-Writ petition is dismissed. [S. 69C, 148A(b), 148A(d), Art. 226]
Shyam Sundar Dhanuka v. ITO (2024) 461 ITR 22 (Cal)(HC) Editorial : Affirmed by division bench, Shyam Sundar Dhanuka v. UOI (2023) 156 taxmann.com 499 /(2024) 461 ITR 25 (Cal)(HC)
S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Matter restored to the AO as the main contention of the assessee that it had not claimed any deduction for such liability was not considered while passing order u/s. 148A (d) of the Act. [S. 148A(b), 148A(d), Art. 226]
Alankar Apartments (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT/(2023) 151 taxmann.com 67 / (2024) 461 ITR 53 (Delhi)(HC)
S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Premature-Before issue of notice u/s 148-Writ petition is dismissed. [S.148, 148A(b), 148A(d), Art. 226]
Yellaiah Setty v. Asst. CIT (2024) 461 ITR 107 (Telangana)(HC)