S. 271D : Penalty-Takes or accepts any loan or deposit-Annulment of assessment-Cancellation of penalty is not valid. [S. 143(3),271E]
Dy. CIT v. C. Gangadhara Murthy v. PCIT (2022) 218 TTJ 19(UO) (Pune)(Trib)S. 271D : Penalty-Takes or accepts any loan or deposit-Annulment of assessment-Cancellation of penalty is not valid. [S. 143(3),271E]
Dy. CIT v. C. Gangadhara Murthy v. PCIT (2022) 218 TTJ 19(UO) (Pune)(Trib)S. 271D : Penalty-Takes or accepts any loan or deposit-Limitation-Two specific periods of limitation-End of financial year in which assessment proceedings completed, or six months from end of month in action for imposition of penalty initiated, whichever is later-Penalty order is barred by limitation. [S. 269SS, 273B, 275 (1)(c)]
Sameer Noorullah Khan v. CIT (Appeals) (2022) 98 ITR 42 (SN)(Mum) (Trib)S. 271C : Penalty-Failure to deduct at source-Purchase of immovable property-Reasonable cause-Not aware of the provision-Penalty was deleted.[S.194IA, 273B]
Manish Jaiswal v. ACIT (2022) 216 DTR 36 / 218 TTJ 737 (Varanasi)(Trib)S. 271C : Penalty-Failure to deduct at source-Deduction and deposit of tax in subsequent year after receipt of invoices-No Tax evasion or loss of revenue-Penalty not leviable [S.40(a)(ia), 273B, 274]
ACIT v. Parsons Brinckershoff India Pvt. Ltd. (2022)95 ITR 71 (Delhi)(Trib)S. 271C : Penalty-Failure to deduct at source-External development charges paid to the Haryana Urban Development Authority-Levy of penalty was deleted.
Signature Builders Pvt. Ltd. v. Add. CIT (2022) 99 ITR 211 (Delhi) (Trib)S. 271B :Penalty-Failure to get accounts audited-Limitation-Notice issued two and half years after assessment order passed-Barred by limitation. [S. 44AB]
Jila Sahakari Kendriya Bank Maryadit v. ITO (2022) 99 ITR 156 /219 TTJ 17 (UO) (Raippur)(Trib)S. 271B : Penalty-Failure to get accounts audited-No finding in the assessment order-Levy of penalty after 30 months after completion of the assessment-Barred by limitation. [S. 44AB, 275(1)(c)]
Jila Sahakari Kendriya Benk Maryadit v. ITO (2022) 219 TTJ 17 (UO)/ 99 ITR 156 (Raipur)(Trib)S. 271AAB : Penalty-Search initiated on or after 1st day of July 2012-Undisclosed income-Assessing Officer initiated penalty proceeding without mentioning specific charge-Show cause notice issued in routine manner-Penalty levied is void ab initio. [S.274]
Mahaveer Prasad Agarwal v. Dy. CIT (2022)98 ITR 200 (Jaipur) (Trib)S. 271AAA : Penalty-Search initiated on or after 1st June, 2007-Undisclosed income-Surrender of income-Addition not based on material discovered during search in any form-Penalty is not valid.[S. 132 (4), 153A]
Garg Brothers Pvt. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2022)95 ITR 18 (SN)/ 217 TTJ 127 / 212 DTR 256 (Kol) (Trib)S. 271AAA : Penalty-Search initiated on or after 1st June, 2007-Disclosure not made in statement recorded during search but pursuant to search action and not voluntary-Penalty justified. [S. 132(4) 271AAB]
Mothers Pride Educational Personna P. Ltd. v. ACIT (2022)100 ITR 44 (SN)(Delhi) (Trib)