S. 144: Best judgment assessment-AO estimating profits at 8 per cent., CIT(A) observed that turnover above turnover limit for presumptive taxation but restricting profits to 5 per cent. Matter remanded back to AO stating that Authorities bound to disprove claim with corroborative documentary evidence after granting assessee adequate opportunity of being heard.

S.144: Best judgment assessment-Natural Justice-Cash Credits–Statements of witnesses relied upon without providing opportunity to cross-examine the witnesses, assessment not sustainable. (68, 131, 144)

S. 144: Best judgment assessment-Liquor Business-Average Net Profit in this line of business which varied from 1 to 3 per cent. And applying net profit rate of 2 per cent is correct. No comparative data brought to rebut finding of AO in retail liquor business. [S.145]

S. 144 : Best judgment assessment-Demonetization-Books of accounts cannot be rejected without issuing any show cause notice-Stock register-Purcahses verified by the Assessing Officer-Rejectiion of books of account is not justified-Cash sales-Deposited in the Banks-Books of account is audited by Chartered Accountant-Not justified by estimating income by applying NP Rate and books of accounts were to be accepted. [S. 68, 115BBE, 133(6) 143(3), 145(3)]

S. 143(3) : Assessment-Scope of scrutiny-AO’s jurisdiction is not limited to just valuing the closing stock but also determining the project cost, project revenue and closing WIP at the end of reporting period-Thus, AO is justified in making addition by revaluing the stock. [S. 145]

S. 143(3) : Assessment-Notice issued to a non-existing entity-Amalgamation-AO was informed-Assessment order passed in the name of a non-existent entity is void and liable to be quashed. [S. 144C]

S. 143(2) : Assessment-Notice-Assessment order is invalid due to the non-issuance of the mandatory notice u/s 143(2) of the Act and quashed the assessment order. [S. 142(1) 143(3), 147,148]

S. 143(2) : Assessment-Notice-Validity-Amalgamation of companies-Effect-Fact of amalgamation brought to Assessing Officer’s notice during assessment proceedings-Assessment proceedings against amalgamating company after approval of amalgamation void ab initio-Amalgamated company’s participation in proceedings not an estoppel against law-Revenue’s appeal against order Of commissioner (appeals) infructuous.[S. 10AA]

S.143(2): Assessment —Notice-Jurisdiction-Condition precedent-Service of notice u/s. 143(2)-No proof regarding service of notice u/s. 143(2)-Assessment order liable to be quashed for want of jurisdiction.[S. 143(3)]

S. 143(2) : Assessment-Notice-Issue of notice beyond statutory limit-Assessing Officer has no power to issue notice under section 143(2) after expiry of 6 months from end of financial year in which return has been field-Reassessment is bad in law.[S. 143(3), 147,148,292BB]