This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S. 268A : Appeal -Instructions – Monetary Limits- Audit objection was not on the issue in the appeal – Appeal was dismissed in Limine. [S. 143(3) 260A, 263]

PCIT v. Urmila Rcp Projects Pvt. Ltd. (No. 2) (2023)453 ITR 43 / 293 Taxman 210 / 331 CTR 579/ 223 DTR 376/293 Taxman 210 (Jharkhand)(HC)

S. 263 : Commissioner – Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue – Commissioner holding view different from that of Assessing Officer on a particular issue -Revision is not justified- High Court cannot set aside finding of Appellate Tribunal unless finding is perverse.[S. 260A]

PCIT v. Britannia Industries Ltd. (2023)453 ITR 576/ 330 CTR 435 (Cal)(HC) Editorial: Order in Britannia Industries Ltd v. PCIT (2023) 102 ITR 513 (Kol)(Trib), is affirmed.

S. 263 : Commissioner – Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue -Capital gains -Cost of improvement -Paid to shareholders under Family Settlement – Discharge encumbrances-Cost of improvement -Relinquishment of rights – Assessing Officer accepting claim -Order erroneous and prejudicial to Revenue -Revision is justified- Order of High Court reversed. [S. 45, 48, 55(1)(b)]

CIT v. Paville Projects Pvt. Ltd. (2023)453 ITR 447/ 293 Taxman 38/ 332 CTR 28/ 224 DTR 185 (SC) Editorial: CIT v. Paville Projects Pvt. Ltd(2017) 398 ITR 603 (Bom)(HC), reversed. Refer Paville Projects Pvt. Ltd v. CIT (2014) 35 ITR 352/ (2016) 71 taxmann.com 287 (Mum)(Trib)

S. 263 : Commissioner – Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue -Total income -Eligible profit -Export profit -Deduction under Section 80HHC to be computed on eligible profits only after reducing profits on which deduction availed of under Section 80IB of the Act -Revision was affirmed -Special Leave to appeal of the assessee was dismissed. [S.80HHC, 800IA(9), 80IB(13)]

Broadways Overseas Ltd. v.CIT (2023)453 ITR 774/ 292 Taxman 33 (SC) Editorial : Broadways Overseas Ltd v. CIT (P& H)(HC) (ITA No. 234 of 2009 dt. 22-11 -2013) is affirmed.

S. 234A : Interest – Default in furnishing return of income – Levy of interest is mandatory. [S. 2(35), 5, 6(3)(ii), 131, 142(1), 143(2), 148, 282]

Mansarovar Commercial Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT (2023)453 ITR 661/ 293 Taxman 312 / 332 CTR 137/ 224 DTR 305 (SC) Editorial: Decision of Delhi High Court, affirmed, CIT v. Mansarovar Commercial Pvt. Ltd (Delhi)(HC) (2016) 134 DTR 105 / 287 CTR 28 (Delhi)(HC).Editorial , Review petition is dismissed ,Mansarovar Commercial Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT (2023)453 ITR 661/ 293 Taxman 312 / 332 CTR 137/ 224 DTR 305 (SC)

S. 197 : Deduction at source – Certificate for lower rate -Non -Resident – Payments under distributor agreement —Certificate for withholding tax at rate of 9.99 Per Cent- Order set aside- Precedent -Supreme Court -Binding on Authorities. [S. 195, Rule 28AA, Art. 226]

Milestone Systems A/S v. Dy. CIT (No. 1) (2023) 453 ITR 250 //150 taxmann.com 348 / 334 CTR 89/ 225 DTR 369 (Delhi)(HC) Milestone Systems A/S v. Dy. CIT (NO. 2) (2023)453 ITR 255 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 195 : Deduction at source – Non-resident -Observations of High Court that if in assessment proceedings of Netherlands company, that company held liable to be taxed in India and assessee would also be treated as in default -Observation was quashed. [S.40(a)(i)), Art. 136]

Van Oord Acz India Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT (2023)453 ITR 214 / 292 Taxman 405/ 226 DTR 89 (SC) Editorial: Observation of Delhi High Court set aside, Van Oord Acz India Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT (2010) 323 ITR 130 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 158BE : Block assessment – Time limit – Search and seizure – Limitation -From date of last Panchnama and not date of last warrant of authorisation [S. 132, 158C]

Anil Minda v. CIT (2023) 453 ITR 1 / 292 Taxman 407 /331 CTR 705 / 224 DTR 665 (SC) Editorial: CIT v. Anil Minda (2010) 328 ITR 320 (Delhi)(HC) is affirmed.

S. 156 : Notice of demand -Bogus accommodation entries – lacked bona fides- Refund of money transferred to bank account in which Department had Lien for tax dues of company- Question of facts -The assessee was directed to approach appropriate Forum or Civil Court for recovery of its claim. [Art. 226]

Garwal Logistics Ltd. v. CIT (2023)453 ITR 524 (Delhi)(HC) Editorial: Order of single judge is affirmed, Garhwal Logistics Ltd. v. ITO (2023)453 ITR 527 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 156 : Notice of demand -Bogus accommodation entries – lacked bona fides- Refund of money transferred to bank account in which Department had Lien for tax dues of company- Question of facts –Single judge held that the assessee should approach appropriate Forum or Civil Court [Art. 226]

Garhwal Logistics Ltd. v. ITO (2023)453 ITR 527 (Delhi)(HC) Editorial : Order single judge, Garwal Logistics Ltd. v. CIT (2023)453 ITR 524 (Delhi)(HC),