This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Pendency of appeal before CIT(A)-Commissioner can assume jurisdiction under section 263 in respect of issues which have not been considered and decided by Commissioner (Appeals)-Cash credits-Accommodation entries-Revision is held to be valid. [S. 68, 148]

JR Industries v. PCIT (2022) 192 ITD 414 /99 ITR 422/ 217 TTJ 412 (Jaipur)(Trib.)/OM Industries v.PCIT (2022) 192 ITD 414/ 99 ITR 422/ 217 TTJ 412 (Jaipur) (Trib.)/Vikas Oil Products v. PCIT 192 ITD 414/ 99 ITR 422/ 217 TTJ 412 (Jaipur) (Trib.)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Order passed by the Assessing Officer of a different jurisdiction-Assessment order was passed on basis of an invalid and non est notice, it could not be countenanced in law, and consequently, revisional action is not permissible hence not valid. [S. 127, 143(2), 143(3), 292BB]

Minimax Commerce (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT (2022) 192 ITD 303 / 219 TTJ 24 (UO) (Raipur)(Trib.)

S. 250 : Appeal-Commissioner (Appeals)-Procedure-Principle of natural justice-Dismissal of appeal without granting right to be heard-Matter remanded [S. 154]

Parminder Singh Grewal. v. ITO (2022) 192 ITD 592 (SMC) (Chd.)(Trib.)

S. 250 : Appeal-Commissioner (Appeals)-Procedure-Failure to attend on specified date-Failure to consider additional evidence-Order was set aside and directed to pass speaking order. [S. 251]

Rajesh Kumar Singhal v. ITO (2022) 192 ITD 133 (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 244A : Refund-Interest on refunds-Excess tax deduction at source–Entitled to interest on refund of excess deduction of tax at source under section 195 of the Act.

Infosys BPO Ltd. v. DCIT (2022) 192 ITD 94 / / 217 TTJ 478/ 214 DTR 89 (Bang)(Trib.)

S. 194J : Deduction at source-Fees for professional or technical services-Transaction charges-TDS is deductible under section 194I and not under section 194J [S. 194I]

Shivnarayan Nemani Shares & Stock Brokers (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT (2022) 192 ITD 50 (Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 148 : Reassessment-Notice-Service of notice-Information through RTI-Generalistic notice issued without mentioning full and correct address of assessee would not be a valid notice for reopening of assessment-Matter remanded to the file of CIT(A). [S. 147]

Santosh (Smt.) v. ITO (2022) 192 ITD 189 (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 147 : Reassessment-Alleged non conduct of Audit-Reassessment notice is not valid. [S 44AB, 80IB(11A), 133(6), 148]

Bindra Warehousing Corporation v. ITO (2022) 192 ITD 15 (SMC) (Jabalpur)(Trib.)

S. 145 : Method of accounting-No adverse findings by the Chartered Accountant who has audited books of account-Estimation of net profit is not justified.

Krishna Mohan Choursiya v. ITO (2022) 192 ITD 214 (Indore) (Trib.)

S. 145 : Method of accounting-Scrap sale-Estimation of profit-Survey-Not able to reconcile-Addition is held to be justified. [S.133A]

Jaico Automobile Engineering Company (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT (2022) 192 ITD 147 (Bang.)(Trib.)