S.37(1): Business expenditure-Additional levy of coal pursuant to Supreme court direction-Allowable as deduction. [S. 145]
Jindal Steel and Power Ltd. v. Add. CIT (2022)97 ITR 516 (Delhi) (Trib)S.37(1): Business expenditure-Additional levy of coal pursuant to Supreme court direction-Allowable as deduction. [S. 145]
Jindal Steel and Power Ltd. v. Add. CIT (2022)97 ITR 516 (Delhi) (Trib)S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Travelling expenses-Ad-hoc disallowance is not justified.
Jindal Steel and Power Ltd. v. Add. CIT (2022)97 ITR 516 (Delhi) (Trib)S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Mercantile system of accounting-leas rent paid pertaining to earlier year-Crystallised during financial year-Allowable as deduction.[S. 145]
Kamla Retail Ltd. v. Addl. CIT(2022) 212 DTR 94 / 216 TTJ 483 / 140 taxmann.com 343 (Chd)(Trib)S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Foreign Travel expense-Expenses or payments not deductible-Excessive or unreasonable-Motor Car Expenditure to director-Restriction of disallowance to 10% is held to be justified.[S. 40A(2)]
Dy. CIT v. S. Kumars Nationwide Ltd. (2022) 97 ITR 60 (SN) (Mum) (Trib)S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Capital or revenue-Payment for subscription services of software-No acquisition of software-Telephone and internet expenses-Allowable as revenue expenditure.
Bigfoot Retail Solution Pvt. Ltd v. ACIT (2022)97 ITR 73 (SN)(Delhi)(Trib)S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Capital or Revenue-Non-compete fee-Amortised-Depreciation claimed-Capital expenditure. [S. 32]
Adler Mediequip Pvt. Ltd v. Dy.CIT (2022)97 ITR 20 (SN) (Pune) (Trib)S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Restatement of foreign exchange loss-Assessing Officer directed to verify and allow.
Triumph International (India) Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT (2022)100 ITR 33 (SN)(Chennai) (Trib)S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Provision for slow or non-moving and obsolete inventory-A separate provision in this regard, could not be allowed to the assessee-Liability not crystallised is not allowable as deduction. [S. 145]
Roca Bathroom Products Pvt. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2022)100 ITR 65 (SN)(Chennai) (Trib)S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Capital or Revenue-Advertisement expenses not debited to Profit and loss account but accounted in balance-sheet as “Capital Work-In-Progress (Brand Building expenditure)”-Allowable as deduction. [S. 145]
ACIT v. Rosebys Interiors India Ltd. (2022)100 ITR 4 (SN)(Ahd) (Trib)S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Employees’ Stock Option Scheme-Deducted tax at source in respect of share-based compensation under taxed in hands of employees as perquisite-Cross-charge expenses-Allowable as deduction-Assessing Officer was directed to verify whether amount subject to tax deduction at source-Matter Remanded. [S. 15, 17(1), 40(a)(i), 192, 195]
EIT Services India Pvt. Ltd. v. Dy CIT (2022) 100 ITR 490 (Bang.)(Trib.)