This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S. 271(1)(c): Penalty-Concealment-Estimate of income at 20 % of receipts-Levy of penalty is not valid [S. 44BBB]

Lahmeyer Holding Gambh v. Dy. CIT (2022)96 ITR 455 (Trib) (Delhi) (Trib)

S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty-Concealment-Notice not specifying the charge for which penalty was being levied-Levy of penalty is not justified.

Dy. CIT v. Scooters India Ltd. (2022) 96 ITR 460 (Lucknow) (Trib)

S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty-Concealment-Inaccurate particulars of income-Deemed dividend taxed in the hands of assessee-Question in whose hands dividend to be taxed-cannot be subject matter of penalty for irregular particulars of income-Penalty levied incorrect. [2(22)(e)]

ITO v. Chetan Seth (2022) 97 ITR 597 (Delhi) (Trib)

S. 271(1)(c): Penalty-Concealment-Penalty notice not specific whether it is a Concealment of income of furnishing of incorrect particulars of income-No intention of making inaccurate gains by assessee-Deletion of penalty is held to be justified.[S. 274]

Dy. CIT v. Future E-Commerce Infrastructure Ltd. (2022)97 ITR 508 (Mum) (Trib)

S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty-Concealment-Addition deleted-Income deleted by Tribunal could not be held as considered for imposition of penalty.[S.274]

Maharashtra Academy of Engineering and Educational Research v.ITO (2022)97 ITR 31 (SN)(Pune) (Trib)

S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty-Concealment-Transfer pricing-Conducted detailed functions, assets and risk analysis of international transactions-Documentations not rejected-Penalty not warranted. [S. 92C, 92D R.10D]

Dy. CIT v. Sitel India Ltd. (2022)97 ITR 65 (SN)(Mum) (Trib)

S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty-Concealment-Additional evidence-Capital asset-Failure to declare capital gain-Land outside 8 Km-Penalty order set aside-Mater remanded. [S.2(14)(iii)), 275 (1) (C).]

Kishor Madhav Paranjape v Dy. CIT (2022) 97 ITR 45 (SN.) (Pune)(Trib)

S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty-Concealment-Interest-Donation-of small sums-Penalty not leviable merely because receipts could not be located. [S. 37(1), 80G]

Gulshan Chemicals Ltd. v. ACIT (2022)97 ITR 59 (SN)(Delhi)(Trib)

S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty-Concealment-Neither Assessment order nor penalty notice specifying whether proceedings initiated for concealment of income or filing inaccurate particulars of income-Penalty is not valid [S. 274]

Lear Automotive India Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT (2022)100 ITR 3 (SN) (Pune) (Trib)

S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty-Concealment-Difference between interest declared in books and Form 26AS-levy of penalty is not justified [Form, 26AS]

Dy. CIT v. Jagson International Ltd. (2022)100 ITR 69 (SN) (Delhi) (Trib)