S. 271(1)(c): Penalty-Concealment-Estimate of income at 20 % of receipts-Levy of penalty is not valid [S. 44BBB]
Lahmeyer Holding Gambh v. Dy. CIT (2022)96 ITR 455 (Trib) (Delhi) (Trib)S. 271(1)(c): Penalty-Concealment-Estimate of income at 20 % of receipts-Levy of penalty is not valid [S. 44BBB]
Lahmeyer Holding Gambh v. Dy. CIT (2022)96 ITR 455 (Trib) (Delhi) (Trib)S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty-Concealment-Notice not specifying the charge for which penalty was being levied-Levy of penalty is not justified.
Dy. CIT v. Scooters India Ltd. (2022) 96 ITR 460 (Lucknow) (Trib)S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty-Concealment-Inaccurate particulars of income-Deemed dividend taxed in the hands of assessee-Question in whose hands dividend to be taxed-cannot be subject matter of penalty for irregular particulars of income-Penalty levied incorrect. [2(22)(e)]
ITO v. Chetan Seth (2022) 97 ITR 597 (Delhi) (Trib)S. 271(1)(c): Penalty-Concealment-Penalty notice not specific whether it is a Concealment of income of furnishing of incorrect particulars of income-No intention of making inaccurate gains by assessee-Deletion of penalty is held to be justified.[S. 274]
Dy. CIT v. Future E-Commerce Infrastructure Ltd. (2022)97 ITR 508 (Mum) (Trib)S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty-Concealment-Addition deleted-Income deleted by Tribunal could not be held as considered for imposition of penalty.[S.274]
Maharashtra Academy of Engineering and Educational Research v.ITO (2022)97 ITR 31 (SN)(Pune) (Trib)S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty-Concealment-Transfer pricing-Conducted detailed functions, assets and risk analysis of international transactions-Documentations not rejected-Penalty not warranted. [S. 92C, 92D R.10D]
Dy. CIT v. Sitel India Ltd. (2022)97 ITR 65 (SN)(Mum) (Trib)S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty-Concealment-Additional evidence-Capital asset-Failure to declare capital gain-Land outside 8 Km-Penalty order set aside-Mater remanded. [S.2(14)(iii)), 275 (1) (C).]
Kishor Madhav Paranjape v Dy. CIT (2022) 97 ITR 45 (SN.) (Pune)(Trib)S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty-Concealment-Interest-Donation-of small sums-Penalty not leviable merely because receipts could not be located. [S. 37(1), 80G]
Gulshan Chemicals Ltd. v. ACIT (2022)97 ITR 59 (SN)(Delhi)(Trib)S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty-Concealment-Neither Assessment order nor penalty notice specifying whether proceedings initiated for concealment of income or filing inaccurate particulars of income-Penalty is not valid [S. 274]
Lear Automotive India Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT (2022)100 ITR 3 (SN) (Pune) (Trib)S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty-Concealment-Difference between interest declared in books and Form 26AS-levy of penalty is not justified [Form, 26AS]
Dy. CIT v. Jagson International Ltd. (2022)100 ITR 69 (SN) (Delhi) (Trib)