S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Capital or revenue expenditure-Temporary structure-100% depreciation is allowable.[S. 32]
ACIT v. PSN Automative Marketing (P) Ltd (2022) 100 ITR 69 (Cochin) (Trib)S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Capital or revenue expenditure-Temporary structure-100% depreciation is allowable.[S. 32]
ACIT v. PSN Automative Marketing (P) Ltd (2022) 100 ITR 69 (Cochin) (Trib)S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Miscellaneous expenditure-Ad Hoc disallowance-Deletion is held to be proper.
Dy. CIT v. Mahendra Brothers Exports Pvt. Ltd. (2022) 99 ITR 537 (Mum)(Trib)S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Credit card expenses of employee-Matter remanded for verification.
Capgemini India Pvt. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2022) 99 ITR 506 (Mum)(Trib)S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Capital or Revenue Expenditure-Payment for acquisition of application software-Revenue expenditure.
Altisource Business Solutions Pvt. Ltd. v. ITO (2022) 99 ITR 647 (Bang) (Trib)S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Financial assistance to meritorious students-Not contingent-Allowable as deduction-Capital or revenue-Expenditure for new electricity connection and Meter cost-Internet networking expenses-Payment to Municipality for name transfer fee-allowable as revenue expenditure-Expenses incurred for extension of height of existing boundary wall-Capital expenditure-Fines and penalties-Expenses for regularisation of construction of old building-Penalty imposed by Urban Improvement Trust on account of unauthorised construction-Not allowable as business expenditure.[S. 145]
Allen Career Institute v. JCIT (2022) 99 ITR 269 (Jaipur) (Trib)S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Ex gratia payment-Deduction should be allowed although liability may have to be quantified and discharged at future date-Matter remanded. [S. 145]
Karnataka State Beverages Corporation Ltd. v. ACIT (2022) 99 ITR 325 (Bang) (Trib)S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Expenditure is not substantiated with valid vouchers-Disallowance is affirmed.
Mahamedha Urban Co-Operative Bank Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2022) 99 ITR 669 (Delhi) (Trib)S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Capital or revenue-Application software-Net working with 125 branches-Allowable as revenue expenditure.
ACIT v. Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd (As successor in business of eralt while, Vysya Bank Ltd (2022) 215 TTJ 409 /210 DTR 81 (Bang)(Trib)S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Post-production expenses of feature film-Producer and distributor-Allowable as business expenditure-Rule 9A or Rule 9B is not applicable. Reassessment on change of opinion is bad in law-Resale of set material-Estimated at 5 per cent of total cost incurred on such set materials. [S. 143(3), 147, 148 Rule, 9A, 9B]
ACIT v. A.M. Ratnam (2022) 215 TTJ 665 / 210 DTR 1 (Chennai)(Trib)S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Entertainment expenses Disallowance was restricted to 10%-Held to be proper-Transfer pricing adjustment deleted by the CIT(A) was affirmed [S. 92C]
Dy. CIT v. Manaksia Steels Ltd. (2022)99 ITR 12 (SN)(Kol) (Trib)