S. 32 : Depreciation-Unabsorbed depreciation-Set-off-Disallowance was deleted. [S. 32(2)]
Adm Agro Industries Latur and Vizag Pvt. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2022) 96 ITR 450 (Delhi)(Trib)S. 32 : Depreciation-Unabsorbed depreciation-Set-off-Disallowance was deleted. [S. 32(2)]
Adm Agro Industries Latur and Vizag Pvt. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2022) 96 ITR 450 (Delhi)(Trib)S. 32 : Depreciation-Option to claim depreciation-Opting not to claim depreciation at rates specified in Appendix 1a-Eligible to claim depreciation according to Rule 5(1) and not Rule (5a)-The Assessing Officer is directed to allow W.D.V of depreciation. [R. 5(1), (1a), Appex. 1,IA]
Jindal Steel and Power Ltd. v. Add. CIT (2022) 97 ITR 516 (Delhi) (Trib)S. 32: Depreciation-Block of asset-Depreciation is allowable irrespective whether asset is used or not.[S. 2(11)]
Dy. CIT v. Jagson International Ltd. (2022) 97 ITR 176 (Delhi) (Trib)S. 32 : Depreciation-Additional claim-Claim made by filing letter-Rejection of claim is not justified.
ACIT v. Nahar Industrial Enterprises Ltd. (2022) 219 DTR 73 / 219 TTJ 544 / 99 ITR 562 / 142 taxmann.com 52 (Chd)(Trib) ACIT v. Nahar Spinning Mills Ltd (2022) 219 DTR 73 / 219 TTJ 544/ 99 ITR 562 /142 taxmann.com 52 (Chd)(Trib) ACIT v. Oswal Woollen Mills Ltd. (2022) 219 DTR 73/ 219 TTJ 544 /99 ITR 562 / 142 taxmann.com 52 (Chd)(Trib)S. 32: Depreciation-Generation and distribution of power-Multiple units of Captive Power Plant-Adopting Straight Line Method-Accepted in previous and subsequent years-No change in facts-Directed to allow depreciation on Straight Line Method. [S. 32(1)(i)]
SEl Manufacturing Co. Ltd v. Dy.CIT (2022)97 ITR 79 (SN) (Chd)(Trib)S. 32: Depreciation-Additional depreciation-Allowable only in the year of acquisition and installation-Capitalization of Foreign Exchange Loss incurred on acquisition of Plant and Machinery outside India-Additional cost capitalized not eligible for depreciation. [S. 32(1)(iia), 43A]
Daeseung Autoparts India Pvt. Ltd v. ACIT (2022) 97 ITR 76 (SN) (Chennai)(Trib)S. 32 : Depreciation-Software-Eligible for depreciation at 60 per cent.
Roca Bathroom Products Pvt. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2022)100 ITR 65 (SN) (Chennai)(Trib)S. 32 :Depreciation-Commission-Liquidated damages-Deduction from sale consideration-Matter remanded. [S. 37(1)
TE Connectivity India P. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT, LTU (2022) 99 ITR 379 (Bang) (Trib)S. 32 : Depreciation-Unabsorbed depreciation–Carry forward and set off-Could be set off during any number of years in view of the provisions of S. 32(2) as amended by Finance Act, 2001.[S. 32(2)]
ACIT v. J. K. Fenner (India) Ltd. (2022) 220 TTJ 595 (Chennai)(Trib)S.32: Depreciation-Ownership of property-Possession of property-Full payment was made-Registration was completed within six date of agreement-Ownership relates back to date of agreement.[Indian Registration Act, 1908, 23, 47]
Jet Freight Logistics Ltd. v. CIT (Appeals) (NFAC) (2022)99 ITR 37 (SN)(Mum) (Trib)