This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S. 68 : Cash credits-Penny stock-Long term capital gains-Sale of shares-Broker on SEBI watchlist-Addition was deleted. [S. 10(38), 45]

Neeta Bothra (Mrs.) v. ITO (2021) 92 ITR 450 (Chennai)(Trib.)

S. 68 : Cash credits-Long term capital gains-Opportunity of cross examination was not given-Denial of exemption was not justified-Estimate of expenses was also deleted-Additional evidence was admitted. [S. 10 (38), 45, 69C, 132(4), ITAT R. 29]

Sanjay Singal v. Dy.CIT (2021) 92 ITR 214 (Chd.)(Trib.) Aarti Singal (Smt.) v. Dy.CIT (2021) 92 ITR 214 (Chd.)(Trib.) Aniket Singhal v. Dy.CIT (2021) 92 ITR 214 (Chd.)(Trib.) Sanjay Singhal (HUF) v. Dy. CIT (2021) 92 ITR 214 (Chd.)(Trib.)

S. 56 : Income from other sources-Issue of right shares to existing share holders at below market value-Issue of shares at bellow fair market value-Addition was deleted. [S. 56(2)(vii)(c)(ii)]

ITO v. Rajeev Ratanlal Tulshyan (2021) 92 ITR 332 / (2022) 193 ITD 860 (Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 54 : Capital gains-Profit on sale of property used for residence-Purchase of new residential house-Date of delivery of possession of new property within one year prior to date of execution of sale deed of original Asset-Entitle for Exemption. [S. 45]

Pushpa Sankar v. ITO (2021) 92 ITR 44 (SN) (Chennai)(Trib.)

S. 44AD : Presumptive taxation-Supplier of security guards-Disclosure of profits at 8 Percent of gross receipts-Failure to pay advance tax-Directed to pay at 10 percent. [S. 44AA, 44AB, 234C]

Shanti Ranjan Biswas v. ITO (2021) 92 ITR 328 (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 40A(3) : Expenses or payments not deductible-Cash payments exceeding prescribed limits-Aggregate of payments in a day did not exceed Rs.20000-No disallowance can be made.

Viney Corporation Ltd. v. ACIT (2021)92 ITR 59 (SN) (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Fines and penalties-Interest on arrears of Service tax-Not penal in nature-Allowable as deduction.

Dy. CIT v. PLR Projects Pvt Ltd (2021) 92 ITR 23 (SN) (Hyd.)(Trib.)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Consultancy charges paid to technical persons-Expenditure cannot be disallowed on estimate basis.

Lauren Software Pvt. Ltd. v. ITO (2021) 92 ITR 47 (SN) (Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Foreign Exchange loss-Allowable as revenue expenditure.

Viney Corporation Ltd. v. ACIT (2021) 92 ITR 59 (SN) (Delhi)(Trib.) Carlson Hospitality Marketing (India) Pvt. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2021) 92 ITR 27 (SN) (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Media business selling advertisement airtime on its Channel-Discount allowed-Allowable as revenue expenditure-Unpaid leave and encashment-Directed the Assessing Officer to verify actual payment. [S. 43B(f)]

JCIT v. T. V. Today Network Ltd. (2021) 92 ITR 53 (SN) (Delhi) (Trib.)