S. 147 : Reassessment-Notice-Additions made on the ground different from reassessment grounds-Reassessment not sustainable. [S.148]
Jeet Singh v. ITO (2022) 98 ITR 331 (Delhi) (Trib)S. 147 : Reassessment-Notice-Additions made on the ground different from reassessment grounds-Reassessment not sustainable. [S.148]
Jeet Singh v. ITO (2022) 98 ITR 331 (Delhi) (Trib)S. 147 : Reassessment-Additions made for issues different from ground of reassessment-Additions not sustainable. [S. 148]
Pushpa Singh v. PCIT (2022)98 ITR 79 /(2023) 224 TTJ 20(Pat) (Trib)S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Cash credits-No failure to disclose material facts-Reassessment is invalid. [S. 68, 148]
Dy. CIT v. Pacharia Exports Pvt. Ltd. (2022)95 ITR 13 (Kol) (Trib)S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Accommodation entries-Information from DDI (Inv)-No failure to disclose material facts. [S. 68, 143(3), 148]
Dy.CIT v. Pacharia Exports P. Ltd (2022) 95 ITR 13 (SN) (Kol) (Trib)S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Non-Resident-Presumptive Tax-No failure to disclose fully and truly all material facts–Reassessment is not valid. [S. 44BB, 143(3), 148]
G and T Resources (Europe) Ltd. v. Add. DIT (IT) (2022) 96 ITR 6 (SN) (Dehradun)(Trib)S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-No failure to disclose material facts-Reassessment order is invalid. [S. 148]
ACIT v. West Bengal Agro Industries Corporation Ltd. (2022)97 ITR 33 (SN) (Kol) (Trib)S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-No failure to disclose material facts-Reassessment not valid-Accumulation of income-Claim that 15 Per Cent. of gross receipts should be allowed to be carried forward and up to 85 Per Cent. of gross receipts required to be applied in a year-Corpus donation-Excess application of preceding assessment year can be set off against current year’s receipts. [S. 11, 148]
Jubilee Mission Hospital v. Dy. CIT (2022)100 ITR 221 (Cochin) (Trib)S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-No failure to disclose material facts-Audit objection-[S. 40(a)(ia), 143(3), 148]
Shree Rajendra Engineering Enterprises v. Dy. CIT (2022) 98 ITR 32 (SN) (Raipur) (Trib)S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Bogus purchase-No disallowance made on account of bogus purchase-Reassessment proceedings quashed. [S.69C, 148]
Basant Dharmichand Jain v. Dy. CIT (2022)98 ITR 694 (Mum) (Trib)S. 145A : Method of accounting-Valuation-Closing stock-Assessing Officer taking average mark-up of 25 Per Cent.-Directed to take average mark-up of 32 Per Cent. to arrive at cost price of closing stock as on date of search. [S. 132]
ACIT v. New Saravana Stores Brahmandamai (2022)95 ITR 7 (SN)(Chennai) (Trib)