This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S. 254(1) : Appellate Tribunal-Duties-Condonation of delay-Dismissal of appeal for non attendance by the assessee-Order of dismissal was set aside-Matter was to be remanded back to Tribunal to decide issue on merits. [S. 254(2)]

Radheshyam Patel v. UOI (2023) 292 Taxman 146 (MP)(HC)

S. 252A : Qualifications, terms and conditions of service of President, Vice-President and Members-Retirement-Applicant had offered her candidature for appointment as member of Tribunal, in pursuance of Circular of 2013-Right of applicant to appointment having been crystallized before 2017 Rules, appointment of applicant would be governed by position as it existed prior to 2017 Rules-Her tenure would be extended until she attained age of 62 years. [Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Members (Recruitment and Conditions of Service) Rules, 1963, R. 3, 11.

Madras Bar Association v. UOI (2023) 292 Taxman 467 (SC)

S. 234A : Interest-Default in furnishing return of income-Settlement Commission-Allowed credit of pre-paid taxes-Interest under section 234B(2A) can be levied only on balance tax payable-Short paid for period after due date of filing return on which the return was filed. [S. 132, 133A, 234B(2A), 245C 245D(4), Art. 226]

Shiv Shipping and Logistics v. ITSC (2023) 292 Taxman 390 (Guj.)(HC)

S. 220 : Collection and recovery-Assessee deemed in default-Stay-Pendency of appeal before Commissioner (Appeals)-65 percent of total demand was adjusted-Application for releasing beyond 20 percent of demand raised by the Assessing Officer was rejected-Revenue was to be directed to refund amount adjusted beyond 20 per cent of demand raised.[Art. 226]

Neo Structo Construction (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT (2023) 292 Taxman 162/ 224 DTR 72 (Guj.)(HC)

S. 199 : Deduction at source-Credit for tax deducted-Interest income of deceased husband was shown in her return of income-Tax deducted which was reflected in Form No. 26AS has to be allowed to the assessee, though physical grant if refund was not feasible through system. [Art. 226]

Nayana Kanakbhai Hutheesing v. ITO (2023) 292 Taxman 588 (Guj.)(HC)

S. 197 : Deduction at source-Certificate for lower rate-Income deemed to accrue or arise in India-Fees for technical services-India-UAE DTAA did not contain article of FTS and the assessee had no PE in India, directed to issue certificate pegging withholding tax at 4 per cent-DTAA-India-UAE. [S. 9(1)(vii), Art. 7, 10, Art. 226]

WTS Energy DMCC v. Dy. CIT (2023) 451 ITR 175 / 292 Taxman 52 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 153A : Assessment-Search or requisition-Finality of assessment-No incriminating material-No abatement of concluded proceedings-Notice is issued in SLP filed by the Revenue. [S. 132, 143(3)]

PCIT (Central) v. Delhi International Airport (P.) Ltd. (2023) 292 Taxman 4 (SC) Editorial : PCIT v. Delhi International Airport (P.) Ltd (2022) 443 ITR 382 / 140 taxmann.com 440 (Karn)(HC)

S. 148A : Reassessment-Limitation-Effect of notification-Interpretation of taxing statutes-Notices issued pursuant to the case of UOI v. Ashish Agarwal (2022) 444 ITR 1/ 213 DTR 217/ 326 CTR 473/ 286 Taxman / AIR 2022 SC 2781 (SC)-Notice issued on or after 01.04.2021, the period concerned is between 01.04.2021 to 30.06.2021-Relaxation Act will not apply-The law as per Finance Act, 2021 has to be followed-Notice issued for Assessment years 2013-14 and 2014-15 are barred by limitation-The submission that the UOI v. Ashish Agarwal (Supra) would be applicable to the cases, where such notices have been challenged before different High Courts only, were not accepted. [S. 119, 147, 148, 148A(d), 149, 151, 151A, Taxation and Other Laws (Relaxation & Amendment of Certain Provisions) Act, 2020, S. 3(1), CBDT Instruction, 31-3-2021, Art. 226]

Mohit Industries Ltd. v. ACIT (2023) 292 Taxman 224 (Guj.)(HC)

S. 148A : Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Unexplained expenditure-Bogus purchases-Violation of principle of natural justice-Information was not provided-Notice and order was set aside. [S. 148, 148A(b), 148(d), Art. 226]

Yuva Trading Co. (P.) Ltd. v. ITO (2023) 292 Taxman 598 (Guj.)(HC)

S. 148A : Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Unexplained money-Violation of principle of natural justice-Flagged information on Insight Portal-Risk Management Strategy-Failure to furnish information-Notice and consequential proceedings pursuant thereto were set aside. [S. 143(1), 148, 148A(b), 148A(d), Art. 226]

Prakashchandra Chhotalal Shah v. ITO (2023) 292 Taxman 518 (Guj.)(HC)