S. 22 : Income from house property-No change in facts-Cannot be treated as income from business and profession.[S. 28(i)]
Pawa Builders Pvt. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2023)101 ITR 43 (SN)(Delhi) (Trib)S. 22 : Income from house property-No change in facts-Cannot be treated as income from business and profession.[S. 28(i)]
Pawa Builders Pvt. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2023)101 ITR 43 (SN)(Delhi) (Trib)S. 14A : Disallowance of expenditure-Exempt income-Disallowance cannot exceed exempt income-AO is directed to restrict disallowance accordingly. [R. 8D]
Hero Corporate Service Pvt. Ltd. v Dy. CIT (2023)101 ITR 77 (SN)(Delhi) (Trib)S.14A : Disallowance of expenditure-Exempt income-Book profits-Disallowance cannot be added to book profits. [S.115JB]
Praxair India P. Ltd. v Dy. CIT (2023)101 ITR 640 (Bang)(Trib)S. 14A : Disallowance of expenditure-Exempt income-Vague and stereotyped reasons for making disallowance-No satisfaction recorded-Disallowance to be reversed.[R. 8D]
Praxair India P. Ltd. v Dy. CIT (2023)101 ITR 640 (Bang)(Trib)S. 14A : Disallowance of expenditure-Exempt income-Absence of exempt income-Disallowance to be deleted. [R. 8D]
Matrimony.Com Ltd. v. ACIT (2023)101 ITR 253 (Chennai)(Trib.)S. 14A : Disallowance of expenditure-Exempt income-Disallowance to be limited to the quantum of exempt income earned-Amendment disallowing irrespective assessee is in receipt of exempt income is prospective. [R. 8D]
Dy. CIT v. Zylog Systems Ltd. (2023)101 ITR 1 (Chennai) (Trib)S. 14A : Disallowance of expenditure-Exempt income-Own funds available to cover investments-Presumption-Own funds are used-Interest expense-Cannot be disallowed-Disallowance can be made only in respect of investment which yielded dividend income. [R. 8D]
ACIT v. Electrosteel Casting Ltd. (2023)101 ITR 359 (Kol) (Trib)S.14A : Disallowance of expenditure-Exempt income-No exempt income earned-Disallowance not warranted. [R. 8D]
Dabur India Ltd. v Dy. CIT (2023)101 ITR 148 (Delhi) (Trib)S. 12AA: Procedure for registration –Trust or institution-Application filed but not disposed of-No evidence showing application pending before CIT (E)-One sided correspondence not proof.[S. 12A]
Domadia Raiyaben Muljibhai Charitable Trust v. CIT (E) (2023)101 ITR 14 (SN) (Surat) (Trib)S. 12A : Registration –Trust or institution-Beneficiaries are members of general public-Conducting workshops to disseminate knowledge of Vedas-Financial assistance and distribution of food-Entitle to registration and approval under section 80G of the Act. [S.80G]
Shri Shruthiparampara Gurukulam v. ITO (E) (2023)101 ITR 598 /200 ITD 517 / 223 TTJ 96(Bang)(Trib)