This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S. 253 : Appellate Tribunal-Monetary limits-Penalty-Exception provided in para 10(e) of Circular No. 17 of 2019 (2019) 426 ITR 106 (St), applicable only for quantum proceedings and cannot be applicable for penalty proceedings – Appeal is not maintainable. [S. 254(1), 271(1)(c)]

Dy. CIT v. Aluvind Architectural Pvt. Ltd. (2021) 88 ITR 421 (Mum.) (Trib.)

S. 251 : Appeal-Commissioner (Appeals)-Power of enhancement-No jurisdiction to travel beyond record-Appeal against cash credits-Enhancement cannot be made for making estimate commission of 2 Per Cent of commission. [S. 68, 251(1)(a)]

ITO v. Angel Cement Pvt. Ltd. (2021)88 ITR 616 (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 153C : Assessment-Income of any other person-Search-Opportunity of cross examination. Was not given-Addition is not valid-Order passed u/s. 143(3) is bad in law-Order ought to have been passed u/s. 153C. [S. 132, 143(3), 153A]

Co-Operative Co. Ltd. v. Dy.CIT (2021)88 ITR 322 (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 153A : Assessment-Search or requisition-No incriminating material was found-Addition cannot be made merely on the basis of post dated cheques without any corroborative evidence. [S. 132]

Elite Realtech Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT (2021) 88 ITR 401 (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 151 : Reassessment-Sanction for issue of notice-Additional ground was admitted-Delay in filing the appeal was condoned-Sanction was mechanical, without application of mind-Order of reassessment was quashed. [S. 147,148, 151, 253, 254(1)]

TEK Chand v. ITO (2021) 88 ITR 392 (Chd.)(Trib.)

S. 148 : Reassessment-Notice-Recording of reason stating that the assessee failed to file return of income-Contradictory to facts on record-Mechanical sanction-Notice u/s. 143 (2) was issued on same day on which the assessee appeared in response to notice u/s 148-Order was quashed. [S. 143 (2) 143(3), 147, 151]

Simranpal Singh Suri v. ITO (2021)88 ITR 9 (SN) (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 148 : Reassessment-Notice-Recording of reason stating that the assessee failed to file return of income-Contradictory to facts on record-Order was quashed. [S. 143(3), 147]

Jaspal Singh v. ITO (SMC) (2021) 88 ITR 407 / 211 TTJ 25 (UO) (Chd.) (Trib.)

S. 148 : Reassessment-Notice-Notice was not served-Approval granted was of mechanical manner-Legal issue-Additional ground was admitted-Reassessment proceedings is quashed. [S. 144, 147, 254(1), 282(1), Civil Procedure Code,1908, Order V rule 12, Order III rule 6]

Charanjit Kaur (Smt.) v. ITO (2021) 88 ITR 414 / 211 TTJ 614/ 201 DTR 185 (Chd.)(Trib.)

S. 147 : Reassessment-Jurisdiction-Notice issued by one Officer-Reassessment order was passed by another circle-No order by Competent Authority transferring case-Order was liable to be quashed. [S. 127(2), 144, 148]

Uttam Singh v. Dy. CIT(IT) (2021) 88 ITR (SN) 1 (Chd.)(Trib.)

S. 147 : Reassessment-Carbon credit-Capital receipt-Reassessment notice to contrary decision of High Court-Held to be in valid. [S. 4, 148]

Clarion Power Corporation Ltd. v. ACIT (2021) 88 ITR 3 (SN) (Hyd.) (Trib.)