This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws
S. 132B : Application of seized or requisitioned assets -Failure to deal with application for release of seized articles -Direction by High Court to consider application. [S. 132, Art. 226]
Yogeshbhai Chandrakant Pala v. ITO (2023)453 ITR 263 / 292 Taxman 370 (Guj)(HC)
S. 132(4) : Search and seizure – Statement on oath-Undisclosed investment-Retraction of statement-Opportunity of cross-examination was not given – Merely on the basis of statement addition is not justified. [S. 69, 132, 260A]
PCIT v. Sanjay Chhabra (2023)453 ITR 516 (Raj)(HC)
S. 127 : Power to transfer cases -Kolkata to Delhi – Opportunity of hearing was given – Transfer for purposes of Co-Ordinated and detailed Investigation -Order of transfer was valid. [S. 127 (2), 132, 133A, Art. 226]
Kamal Nath v. PCIT (NO. 2) (2023)453 ITR 588/ 291 Taxman 532/ 330 CTR 345/ 221 DTR 313 (Cal)(HC)
S. 127 : Power to transfer cases -Kolkata to Delhi -Natural justice – Failure to give an opportunity -Order was set aside.[S. 127(2), 132, 133A, Art, 226]
Kamal Nath v. PCIT (NO. 1) (2023)453 ITR 583 (Cal) (HC)
S. 127 : Power to transfer cases -Kolkata to Delhi – Search and seizure -Survey – Opportunity of hearing was given – Transfer for purposes of Co-Ordinated and detailed Investigation -Order of transfer was valid- The assessee has no right to be assessed under the Income-tax Act, 1961 in a particular area or locality- An order of transfer is purely in the nature of an administrative order passed for consideration of convenience of the Department and no possible prejudice can be involved when the cases have been transferred [S. 127 (2), 132, 133A Art.226]
Kamal Nath v. PCIT (No. 3) (2023)453 ITR 604 / 292 Taxman 295/ 331 CTR 306/ 223 DTR 73 (Cal)(HC) Editorial : Decision of the Single Judge is affirmed, Kamal Nath v. PCIT (NO. 2) (2023)453 ITR 588/ 291 Taxman 532/ 330 CTR 345/ 221 DTR 313 (Cal)(HC).SLP of assessee is dismissed, Kamal Nath v. PCIT (2023)453 ITR 748/ 292 Taxman 240 (SC)
S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price -Adjustment on account of interest-free loans-Libor +2 Per Cent.-Corporate guarantee-Write-off of loss on account of investment in equity shares in subsidiary -Book profits -Provision for doubtful debts -No question of law -Order of High Court affirmed -SLP of Revenue is dismissed. [S. 92B, 115JB, Art. 136]
PCIT v. Vaibhav Global Ltd. (2023)453 ITR 31 (SC) Editorial : PCIT v. Vaibhav Global Ltd. (2023) 453 ITR 24 (Raj)(HC) is affirmed.