S. 32 : Depreciation-Car parked at premises of managing director-Gym Equipment-Depreciation cannot be disallowed on the ground that it was used by the managing director.
ACIT v. Claridges Hotels Pvt. Ltd. (2021) 86 ITR 402 (Delhi)(Trib.)S. 32 : Depreciation-Car parked at premises of managing director-Gym Equipment-Depreciation cannot be disallowed on the ground that it was used by the managing director.
ACIT v. Claridges Hotels Pvt. Ltd. (2021) 86 ITR 402 (Delhi)(Trib.)S. 32 : Depreciation-Computer software-Intangible asset-Entitle to depreciation at 60%.
Dy.CIT v. MPS Infotecnics Pvt. Ltd. (2021) 86 ITR 141 / 211 TTJ 230 / 201 DTR 209 (Delhi)(Trib.)S. 11 : Property held for charitable purposes-Running Hospital, Pharmacy and Diagnostic Centre-Maintaining separate books of account-Receiving subsidies from Government-Denial of exemption was not justified. [S. 2(15), 12AA, 13]
Dy. CIT(E) v. Punjab Medical Foundation Charitable Trust (2021) 86 ITR 495 (Chad.)(Trib.)S. 11 : Property held for charitable purposes-No changes in the nature of activities-Principle of consistency should be followed-Mutuality-Once the activities of the assessee-society were charitable, the principle of mutuality became superfluous. [S. 2(15) 12, 12A, 13]
ACIT(E) v. India Habitat Centre (2021) 86 ITR 290 (Delhi)(Trib.)S.147: Reassessment – After the expiry of four years – Change of opinion – Subsidy – Provision for expenses – Query raised during assessment proceedings – Reply filed – It is not necessary that the assessment order should contain reference or discussion in the assessment order -Order was quashed – Court observed that the order of disposal of objections in to 21 pages and referring 68 case laws without referring the issue under consideration – Faceless Assessing Officer has only wasted his time in writing unsustainable order on objections . [ S. 4, 37(1)), 143(3), 148 ,Art , 226 ]
Hitech Corporation Ltd ( Formerly Known as Hitesh Plast Ltd ) v. ACIT ( Bom)( HC) www.itatonline .org.Service Tax , Finance Act , 1994 .( 1994) 207 ITR 53 (St) (91 )
S . 74: Rectification of mistake –Precedent – Decision rendered by the Tribunal for assessee’s own case is binding on the Commissioner ( Appeals ) – Failure to consider the decision is mistake apparent on record .[ Art , 226 ]
Koluthra Exports Ltd v. UOI 2022 (57) G.S. T.L 112 ( Ker ) (HC)Central Goods and Service tax Act , 2017 .
S. 83 : Provisional attachment to protect revenue in certain cases – Provisional attachment of bank account under sections, 62, 63 , 64 , 67 ,73 or 74 are not maintainable in absence of any proceedings . [S. 62, 63, 64, 67 , 73, 74 , Art , 226 ]
Real Trade v .UOI 2022 (56) G.S.T.L 161 ( Bom)( HC) Real Trade v .UOI 2022 (56) G.S.T.L 161 ( Bom)( HC)Constitution of India .
Art . 141 :Law declared by Supreme Court to be binding on all courts – Interpretation – Two conflicting judgements of Supreme Court – The High Courts must follow the judgement which appears it to lay down the law more elaborately. [ Land Acquisition Act , 1894 , S 53 ]
Swiss Time Ltd v. Umrao AIR 1981 Punjab and Haryana 213 ( FB).S. 263 : Commissioner – Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue -capital or revenue receipt – Subsidy – Order of the Assessing Officer accepting the receipt as capital receipt was ex facie erroneous and potentially prejudice to revenue – Order of the High Court remanding the matter to the Assessing Officer was affirmed [ S. 4 ]
L.G.Electronics India ( P) Ltd v .PCIT ( 2022 ) 134 taxmann.com 330 ( SC) Editorial : Oder of Tribunal in L.G. Electronics India ( P) Ltd v. ACIT ( 2017) 83 taxmann.com 179/ 187 TTJ 470 ( Delhi ) ( Trib) , set aside .S. 148 : Reassessment –Notice – No valid service – Reassessment was bad in law – Service of notice on Advocate , Chartered Accountant or an employee not authorised is not an valid service . [ S. 292BB , CPC 1908 Order ,5 ]
PCIT v. Mahila Real Estate (P) Ltd ( Raj) (HC) . www.itatonline .org