S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Assessing Officer applying his mind and taking possible view-Revision order was quashed. [S.56(2)(vii), 92E, 92F]
Kalyan Buildmart Pvt. Ltd. v. PCIT (2022)100 ITR 642 ((Jaipur) (Trib)
Digest of case laws
Online digest of latest case laws
This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Long-term capital gains-Assessing Officer applied his mind in the course of assessment proceedings-Revision was not valid. [S. 45, 143(3)]
Hindustan Sales Industrial Corporation v. PCIT (2022)100 ITR 126 (Jaipur) (Trib)S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue Speculation business-Loss-Set Off-Issue decided by Tribunal in Assessment Year 2013-14-Cannot be taken up by Principal Commissioner in revision for the Assessment Year 2014-15. [S. 73]
F. G. Investments Pvt. Ltd. v. PCIT (2022)100 ITR 17 (Cochin) (Trib)S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Capital gains-Transfer-Joint Development agreement deed-Deed stamped at fixed value and not regarded as transfer or conveyance of property-Mere registration of agreement and payment of stamp duty cannot attract provision of section 43CA-Revision order was quashed [S. 2(47) 43CA, 50C].
Emporis Properties Pvt. Ltd. v. PCIT (2022) 100 ITR 1 (Kol)(Trib)S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Real estate business-Income from undisclosed sources-Survey-Unrecorded income-Additional income was business income-Income cannot be assessed under section 115BBE of the Act. [S. 68, 69A, 115BBE, 131]
Rekha Shekhawat (Smt.) v. PCIT (2022) 219 TTJ 761 / 218 DTR 161/ 99 ITR 69 (Jaipur)(Trib)S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Payments in cash in excess of prescribed limit-Jewellery business-Exchange of old gold jewellery-No actual transaction of payment of cash for making purchases exceeding limit-No independent enquiry conducted by Principal Commissioner-Revision order was quashed. [S. 40A(3), 143(3)]
Radheyshyam Gupta v. PCIT (2022) 99 ITR 682 (Kol) (Trib)S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Freebies or gifts-stockists and distributors-Enquirers were made in the assessment proceedings-Revision is not valid. [S. 37(1), 153A]
Leeford Health Care Ltd v. PCIT (2022) 99 ITR 19 (Chd)(Trib)S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Assessment order passed giving effect to order of Settlement Commission-Revision is not valid [S. 143(3), 245D(3), 245D(4)]
Siemens Ltd. v. CIT (2022)99 ITR 50 (SN)(Mum) (Trib)S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Business expenditure-Revision is held to be not valid [S. 68, 69C]
Sethi Finmart (P.) Ltd. v. PCIT (2022)99 ITR 59 (SN)(Kol) (Trib)S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Exemption allowed after considering written submissions and supported documents-Revision is held to be not valid [S. 54F]
Sangeeta Ganpati Jadhav (Smt.) v. CCIT (2022)99 ITR 62 (SN)(Pune)(Trib)